From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj2-f1.google.com (mail-pj2-f1.google.com [74.125.227.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 480A03C661D for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.129 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929316; cv=none; b=Ux9IeI2JOgwotFx2y3nYGVW3ksTpLvsL53RqRujFKHIqSLRUHW/wGBLLwekj7+0ccsNOXhzeP/2qiJODpqRnGnRt9ay4P0hS6pX+HXQ75vWQa2Zr4g4eyQ3d58+JFWyrnV/03L1PDJ3B7hjq3BCzkjrfMf7DiYt3I3rPEUWu3YQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784929316; c=relaxed/simple; bh=77AdLZwSlzRXNVmZcPS3aPRWxbdbniwiZ14tXP/9uvk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KYiuSti2j++N/AnSGOBGI3hSaFmI0ma0fi5AR2knteFbOE3s250/pgs+6+wzMk/r7o3DIZoYvFFbfzrigVWdpDDWylP4WUdbXGOViXzDDlaRA0TINB5NFZEgWbnpsx7OdLYtXOPip2mg8uafYNF9iKNuZkzw2ZU41bp6BkQ5MmY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=F98VlwXt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.227.129 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="F98VlwXt" Received: by mail-pj2-f1.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2cabf1f1051so3077515ad.0 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:41:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1784929314; x=1785534114; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=v4ixN669MPx0d/t5228Qef0MeDlKadYsw/AtAwtoW40=; b=F98VlwXtHLSvNA3/J8PgB0MtXpYptRA4vJH+f1BbNkuyk7hnC/OYI+WiQKXZnBk94b 48IzlLfGoW+ntnapKOSLlRmJxhyxm4p0/OQiE2/HoqsJueRc2EZUtgNIKH5WNZKwZ9NJ V9SjcIkLRgTxAzJSK/G8hKcAH17/kftrEXMXyDlaaZxMHvxsfw46byRuXY0L3WQNI5yX FCIFIDRlnv4YD1mPpQu7DaM/h9Om8xe9KeOsycJSqb+4YjdUo+8AnOvxDUUepR4d5EG5 58ykwH+HNkITEHRkxOU0oxFwq/39bwF+kWIFU8iw17iaHmRLgtpky/fURR72dge5RQ/A Eidw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1784929314; x=1785534114; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=v4ixN669MPx0d/t5228Qef0MeDlKadYsw/AtAwtoW40=; b=gWRMvhzm3JZ54pe0bZ1jrpqHSqS7l0f267m5wsNs6SJp2XlflyiBmoexZJwQUYPMbu ODpqakF5LhmlYo/q/1Z4EihhQJ1lXhSQ02IVOrNrREoamGXxHWNgb6Yd0unKmW46WwqV R9bpkdIFw5stZrR8SF14NAs+plLwFT55gTFfVneulInsUh00tLGfn83+YagcYaS8wIsh GD5b6YIu7SdnZ2qgDlo4e/OPjoTuAsTGn9tIB0S50bnn93CvOaipJEy19M0Af8YVk+I5 CML4PifRv+ngMNfJl7+9dSEWh6cKeyy1mNzAeKllrFnMG/7h1BF07BLZZBA91nSZU6ks hZnQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rqhf+etyA3xy7ciT0Rt9zUNLr22ibuMx7yG71HLQ4ZtB8TdjGYKp71GhdkOka9xU/gwDn4zXos1rCUK1w==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxzc+0OeMVPhAtyZ7YoNMeD+Lqc/ULo57ZW2D7e0V24pC2b1LWl SQTzg50GIYzZbOC99M8FLFqV8uIr1XJhjzHBQR30XWVrT/OX7vaxgUQP X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD11OgUy6ltOdRL8Ymp4UxgYrwkp1UjAQFIqqxQm/P1+Ksm35irQPQEFMLcVkp6Y 9Mjo8434u8STTPmh8aWq0bHPnx9xtjwkfy4FIIhxx3AVNSmqBDhGsn1u0+WU47abHrWKdNdvUjJ 3+y1SxPg2UZYWdB8YwZviwq/w5StjsuF/YGUEtaEIJhECvQGsDG81Mcf/12AcOh+GNBRD5N2GIT wzNRZ98K4c2wyJSAItzFT52atNgyXeikLRVr5FiOXVtTKzUKLLVUwpbnmroQBAg6/yBo0Xm5Pup p/vfsSP3hFwT+vB91uE+/D6Fqie7CbaMb2ZRWEhIVjyLvLhqM/YXoRE1BDG9dwjreJTZFVKo6KK w1E4cImU0Vwx/itbRtkYKlZwS8B9vfvBaYcQ6X3mJTvgui5TFmoi02Y+yPtcS4TlhEkJ//cFl9s 0zJ2jP5g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c943:b0:2ca:281:27f9 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2cfde8459edmr1610395ad.27.1784929313662; Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:2ff:43::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2cfde81d81csm504415ad.80.2026.07.24.14.41.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:41:47 -0700 From: Stanislav Fomichev To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Bobby Eshleman , Donald Hunter , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , Gerd Hoffmann , Vivek Kasireddy , Sumit Semwal , Christian =?utf-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , Shuah Khan , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, razor@blackwall.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, almasrymina@google.com, matttbe@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com, dw@davidwei.uk, Joe Damato , Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 3/3] selftests/net: devmem.py: add check_rx_large_niov Message-ID: References: <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-0-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260708-tcpdm-large-niovs-v5-3-34bf6fac941b@meta.com> <20260721110903.34840531@kernel.org> <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260724143001.5afa8631@kernel.org> On 07/24, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jul 2026 14:04:24 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:09:03AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:55:06 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > > > +@ksft_disruptive > > > > +def check_rx_large_niov(cfg) -> None: > > > > + """Run the devmem RX test with rx-buf-size = 16 KiB.""" > > > > + run_rx_large_niov(cfg) > > > > > > Any idea why the devmem tests sprinkle disruptive everywhere? > > > Disruptive means we take the link down, I don't think this test > > > does that. > > > > Talked to Stan and he mentioned the original idea was not necessarily > > just for link down, but any test that could be considered disruptive to > > other tests, with the idea to eventually introduce some scheduling > > (postpone disruptive until the end). > > Perhaps have such conversations on the list? IDK what Stan has in mind. I don't have much to add so I didn't post on the list. In my mind, disruptive started as "anything that can lead to a soft reset". But since the sockets tend to survive these well, I do agree that your definition of "link goes down" is a better fit.