From: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
To: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: v4l2-isp: reject zero-sized parameter blocks
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:35:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aof_nY9mP1eal8UF@zed> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820202544.1256265-1-devnexen@gmail.com>
Hi David
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 09:25:44PM +0100, David Carlier wrote:
> v4l2_isp_params_validate_buffer() walks the blocks of a parameters
> buffer by adding block->size to the current offset. A block whose
> type_info[] entry is an uninitialised hole passes every check on the
> way there: a size of 0 is not caught by the block->size > buffer_size
> test, and the match against the type info size compares 0 with the
> hole's own 0 and passes as well. The walk then makes no forward
> progress and loops forever.
>
> Drivers build their type_info[] arrays with designated initialisers
> indexed by their block type enumeration, so an enumerator left without
> an entry leaves a zeroed hole rather than failing the build. Drivers
> call the validator from vb2 .buf_prepare, so such a hole turns a
> VIDIOC_QBUF on the parameters video device into an unkillable task
> spinning with the queue mutex held.
>
> Reject a block whose type info entry is empty. The driver does not
> implement the type, so it cannot tell whether the block content is
> meaningful, and accepting it silently would leave that content
> unconstrained until a later kernel implements the type and starts
> validating it. The size match then always runs against a non-zero
> size, and no block can advance the walk by zero.
>
> Fixes: 3cb6de6fafb8 ("media: v4l2-core: Introduce v4l2-isp.c")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Suggested-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Thank you for the new version
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - drop the block->size < sizeof(*block) check, redundant now that an
> empty type info entry is rejected before the size match (Jacopo)
> - commit message reworked around the type info check
>
> v3:
> - reject a block whose type info entry is empty instead of skipping
> it, so a type the driver does not implement cannot become
> unconstrained uAPI (Jacopo)
>
> v2:
> - skip an empty type info entry instead of matching the block against
> a zeroed one
> - reworded the commit message, which no longer leans on rppx1
>
> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-isp.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-isp.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-isp.c
> index 1eb46e080afa..8e6c2ef326aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-isp.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-isp.c
> @@ -99,12 +99,25 @@ int v4l2_isp_params_validate_buffer(struct device *dev, struct vb2_buffer *vb,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * An empty type info entry denotes a block type the driver
> + * does not support. Reject the buffer instead of ignoring the
> + * block: accepting it silently would let userspace fill it
> + * with data that a later kernel, once it implements the type,
> + * would validate and possibly reject.
> + */
> + info = &type_info[block->type];
> + if (!info->size) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "Unsupported block type %u at offset %zu\n",
> + block->type, block_offset);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Match the block reported size against the type info provided
> * one, but allow the block to only contain the header in
> * case it is going to be disabled.
> */
> - info = &type_info[block->type];
> if (block->size != info->size &&
> (!(block->flags & V4L2_ISP_PARAMS_FL_BLOCK_DISABLE) ||
> block->size != sizeof(*block))) {
> --
> 2.55.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 20:25 [PATCH v4] media: v4l2-isp: reject zero-sized parameter blocks David Carlier
2026-08-21 7:35 ` Jacopo Mondi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aof_nY9mP1eal8UF@zed \
--to=jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devnexen@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox