From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [v4l-utils] [RFC/PATCH] v4l2-compliance: Don't check bytesused or timestamp for error buffers
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:07:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4aa95de-174b-4a4d-b55d-136aaa2dabff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027191929.2528156-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Laurent,
On 27/10/2026 20:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> When DQBUF returns a buffer marked with the ERROR flag, the bytesused
> and timestamp fields are not meaningful. Don't check them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> I'm sending this as an RFC because the V4L2 API documentation isn't
> clear on the subject.
>
> For the bytesused fields, I'm fairly confident that this change is good.
> A driver can't be expected to provide data for buffers with errors,
> especially if a transmission error occurred.
Dropping all the bytesused tests if ERROR is set isn't a good idea.
If ERROR is set, then bytesused is allowed to be 0, but you still want
to check that e.g. bytesused isn't > length. Otherwise applications that
do not check for the ERROR flag might try to read beyond the buffer size.
So we have to ensure that what the driver returns for data_offset and
bytesused won't go beyond the buffer size. But they may be 0 if the ERROR
flag is set.
>
> Similarly, timestamping a buffer upon error may not be something we can
> always expect from drivers. I'm a bit more hesitant here though: while
> precise timestamping can't be guaranteed, a driver can always use some
> sort of timestamp. Doing so could cause issues though, as a driver for a
> device that provides hardware timestamping would need to switch to a
> software timestamp source for buffers with errors. That would not just
> complicate drivers, but would also make it awkward for userspace.
Makes sense.
>
> There are a few open questions:
>
> - Are there other buffer fields that we should ignore ?
Possibly the 'field'. In practice I think this might only be an issue for
interlaced formats. If we run into problems with that in v4l2-compliance,
then we can always address that later.
>
> - Shoulg (some of) the ignored fields be required to have a specific
> value ? For instance we could require the timestamp to be 0 on error.
No. Leave that to the driver. You'd have to analyze the existing drivers
just to figure out what they are doing today, and drivers using
V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_COPY may still copy the timestamp if they have
enough information to tell which output buffer originated the error.
But perhaps adding a note in the documentation saying that the timestamp is
unreliable for an ERROR buffer would be useful.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp | 22 ++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp
> index dba471e5b488..47d4627ee373 100644
> --- a/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp
> +++ b/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp
> @@ -393,16 +393,20 @@ int buffer::check(unsigned type, unsigned memory, unsigned index,
> warn_once("V4L2_BUF_FLAG_TIMECODE was used!\n");
>
> if (mode == Dequeued) {
> - for (unsigned p = 0; p < g_num_planes(); p++) {
> - if (!(g_flags() & V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST))
> - fail_on_test(!g_bytesused(p));
> - if (!g_bytesused(p))
> - fail_on_test(g_data_offset(p));
> - else
> - fail_on_test(g_data_offset(p) >= g_bytesused(p));
> - fail_on_test(g_bytesused(p) > g_length(p));
> + if (!(g_flags() & V4L2_BUF_FLAG_ERROR)) {
> + for (unsigned p = 0; p < g_num_planes(); p++) {
> + if (!(g_flags() & V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST))
> + fail_on_test(!g_bytesused(p));
> + if (!g_bytesused(p))
> + fail_on_test(g_data_offset(p));
> + else
> + fail_on_test(g_data_offset(p) >= g_bytesused(p));
> + fail_on_test(g_bytesused(p) > g_length(p));
> + }
> +
> + fail_on_test(!g_timestamp().tv_sec && !g_timestamp().tv_usec);
> }
> - fail_on_test(!g_timestamp().tv_sec && !g_timestamp().tv_usec);
> +
> fail_on_test(g_flags() & V4L2_BUF_FLAG_DONE);
>
> // The vivid driver has unreliable timings causing wrong
>
> base-commit: c6600a7e342ef6e336fba02212c90b60a36ca02d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 19:19 [v4l-utils] [RFC/PATCH] v4l2-compliance: Don't check bytesused or timestamp for error buffers Laurent Pinchart
2026-10-29 10:07 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2026-10-29 11:22 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4aa95de-174b-4a4d-b55d-136aaa2dabff@kernel.org \
--to=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
--cc=jacopo.mondi@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox