From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Muralidharan Karicheri <mkaricheri@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adjustments for a lot of function implementations
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3901527-efe8-c36e-97c6-3407ead63370@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl>
> Yes, and you were told not to do it
I have got an other impression.
> like that again.
I continued with the presentation of suggestions from my selection
of change possibilities.
It seems that there are very different expectations for the
preferred patch granularity.
Can it happen again that you are going to use a development tool
like “quilt” (as a maintainer) for the desired recombination
of possible update steps?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-24 10:20 [PATCH 0/6] [media] omap_vout: Adjustments for three function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] [media] omap_vout: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in omap_vout_create_video_devices() SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:35 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-24 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] [media] omap_vout: Improve a size determination in two functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] [media] omap_vout: Adjust a null pointer check " SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] [media] omap_vout: Fix a possible null pointer dereference in omap_vout_open() SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] [media] omap_vout: Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation " SF Markus Elfring
2017-09-24 10:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] [media] omap_vout: Delete two unnecessary variable initialisations in omap_vout_probe() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-30 8:36 ` [PATCH 0/6] [media] omap_vout: Adjustments for three function implementations Hans Verkuil
2017-10-30 9:16 ` Adjustments for a lot of " SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-30 9:47 ` Julia Lawall
2017-10-30 9:57 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-10-30 10:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-30 10:48 ` Hans Verkuil
2017-10-30 11:41 ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-11-26 19:06 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-01-08 11:44 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-02 9:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-02 10:29 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-02-02 12:30 ` SF Markus Elfring
2018-02-10 8:39 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-31 8:27 ` SF Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3901527-efe8-c36e-97c6-3407ead63370@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mkaricheri@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).