From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:61627 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751476AbdJ3Llp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:41:45 -0400 Subject: Re: Adjustments for a lot of function implementations To: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Julia Lawall , Jan Kara , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Muralidharan Karicheri , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <356f75b2-d303-7f10-b76c-95e2f686bd3c@xs4all.nl> <14619198-bebe-d215-5324-a14fbc2103fb@users.sourceforge.net> <049aa1b4-6291-ec24-1ffb-77ae8d1cdb63@users.sourceforge.net> <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:41:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <804550a6-1096-12f1-a0ec-1ccd6bcc191e@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Yes, and you were told not to do it I have got an other impression. > like that again. I continued with the presentation of suggestions from my selection of change possibilities. It seems that there are very different expectations for the preferred patch granularity. Can it happen again that you are going to use a development tool like “quilt” (as a maintainer) for the desired recombination of possible update steps? Regards, Markus