From: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: deathsimple@vodafone.de, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid scheduling on fence status query
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 22:50:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d555eb6a-e975-b025-6ed0-c458b1c71f34@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170426013632.4716-1-andresx7@gmail.com>
CC a few extra lists I missed.
Regards,
Andres
On 2017-04-25 09:36 PM, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
> When a timeout of zero is specified, the caller is only interested in
> the fence status.
>
> In the current implementation, dma_fence_default_wait will always call
> schedule_timeout() at least once for an unsignaled fence. This adds a
> significant overhead to a fence status query.
>
> Avoid this overhead by returning early if a zero timeout is specified.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> This heavily affects the performance of the Source2 engine running on
> radv.
>
> This patch improves dota2(radv) perf on a i7-6700k+RX480 system from
> 72fps->81fps.
>
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> index 0918d3f..348e9e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,9 @@ dma_fence_default_wait(struct dma_fence *fence, bool intr, signed long timeout)
> if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags))
> return ret;
>
> + if (!timeout)
> + return 0;
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
>
> if (intr && signal_pending(current)) {
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-26 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170426013632.4716-1-andresx7@gmail.com>
2017-04-26 2:50 ` Andres Rodriguez [this message]
2017-04-26 7:20 ` [PATCH] dma-buf: avoid scheduling on fence status query Christian König
2017-04-26 9:59 ` Dave Airlie
2017-04-26 10:13 ` Christian König
2017-04-26 14:28 ` Andres Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d555eb6a-e975-b025-6ed0-c458b1c71f34@gmail.com \
--to=andresx7@gmail.com \
--cc=deathsimple@vodafone.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox