Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
	<linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
	David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH] drm-buf: Add debug option
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:24:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e11a28c6-197a-c181-b704-da9debd1f938@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uEUyK17Tu6PyPpMHCoX2XMBqm2fquZJ4fUo9WY+1rK0XA@mail.gmail.com>

Am 15.01.21 um 14:22 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 2:09 PM Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am 15.01.21 um 14:02 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> have too many people abusing the struct page they can get at but
>>> really shouldn't in importers. Aside from that the backing page might
>>> simply not exist (for dynamic p2p mappings) looking at it and using it
>>> e.g. for mmap can also wreak the page handling of the exporter
>>> completely. Importers really must go through the proper interface like
>>> dma_buf_mmap for everything.
>>>
>>> I'm semi-tempted to enforce this for dynamic importers since those
>>> really have no excuse at all to break the rules.
>>>
>>> Unfortuantely we can't store the right pointers somewhere safe to make
>>> sure we oops on something recognizable, so best is to just wrangle
>>> them a bit by flipping all the bits. At least on x86 kernel addresses
>>> have all their high bits sets and the struct page array is fairly low
>>> in the kernel mapping, so flipping all the bits gives us a very high
>>> pointer in userspace and hence excellent chances for an invalid
>>> dereference.
>>>
>>> v2: Add a note to the @map_dma_buf hook that exporters shouldn't do
>>> fancy caching tricks, which would blow up with this address scrambling
>>> trick here (Chris)
>>>
>>> Enable by default when CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG is enabled.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Cc: David Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
>>> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig   |  8 +++++++
>>>    drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>    include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  6 +++++
>>>    3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig b/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig
>>> index 4f8224a6ac95..4e16c71c24b7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/Kconfig
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,14 @@ config DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY
>>>          This is marked experimental because we don't yet have a consistent
>>>          execution context and memory management between drivers.
>>>
>>> +config DMABUF_DEBUG
>>> +     bool "DMA-BUF debug checks"
>>> +     default y if DMA_API_DEBUG
>>> +     help
>>> +       This option enables additional checks for DMA-BUF importers and
>>> +       exporters. Specifically it validates that importers do not peek at the
>>> +       underlying struct page when they import a buffer.
>>> +
>>>    config DMABUF_SELFTESTS
>>>        tristate "Selftests for the dma-buf interfaces"
>>>        default n
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> index 1c9bd51db110..6e4725f7dfde 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>> @@ -666,6 +666,30 @@ void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
>>>
>>> +static struct sg_table * __map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>> +                                    enum dma_data_direction direction)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct sg_table *sg_table;
>>> +
>>> +     sg_table = attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
>>> +
>>> +#if CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG
>>> +     if (sg_table) {
>>> +             int i;
>>> +             struct scatterlist *sg;
>>> +
>>> +             /* To catch abuse of the underlying struct page by importers mix
>>> +              * up the bits, but take care to preserve the low SG_ bits to
>>> +              * not corrupt the sgt. The mixing is undone in __unmap_dma_buf
>>> +              * before passing the sgt back to the exporter. */
>>> +             for_each_sgtable_sg(sg_table, sg, i)
>>> +                     sg->page_link ^= ~0xffUL;
>>> +     }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +     return sg_table;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /**
>>>     * dma_buf_dynamic_attach - Add the device to dma_buf's attachments list
>>>     * @dmabuf:         [in]    buffer to attach device to.
>>> @@ -737,7 +761,7 @@ dma_buf_dynamic_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct device *dev,
>>>                                goto err_unlock;
>>>                }
>>>
>>> -             sgt = dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>>> +             sgt = __map_dma_buf(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>>>                if (!sgt)
>>>                        sgt = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>                if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
>>> @@ -784,6 +808,23 @@ struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_attach);
>>>
>>> +static void __unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>> +                         struct sg_table *sg_table,
>>> +                         enum dma_data_direction direction)
>>> +{
>>> +
>>> +#if CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG
>>> +     if (sg_table) {
>>> +             int i;
>>> +             struct scatterlist *sg;
>>> +
>>> +             for_each_sgtable_sg(sg_table, sg, i)
>>> +                     sg->page_link ^= ~0xffUL;
>>> +     }
>>> +#endif
>> Instead of duplicating this I would rather structure the code so that we
>> have a helper to mangle the sgt when necessary.
>>
>> This can then be called from both the map() as well as the unmap() path.
> Well that's why extracted the helper functions (it would be 4 copies
> otherwise). It's true that it's still 2x the same operation, but
> conceptually one of them mangles, the other unmangles the pointers.
> It's just that with XOR mangling, that's both the same code.
> Readability feels better that way to me, but I guess I can do another
> tiny helper function extraction if you insist?

I think it would be better to have only one.

And I insist that the mangle value is only once somewhere, either use 
just one function or a define/constant.

Christian.

> -Daniel
>
>> Apart from that looks good to me,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> +     attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /**
>>>     * dma_buf_detach - Remove the given attachment from dmabuf's attachments list
>>>     * @dmabuf: [in]    buffer to detach from.
>>> @@ -802,7 +843,7 @@ void dma_buf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
>>>                if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
>>>                        dma_resv_lock(attach->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
>>>
>>> -             dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, attach->sgt, attach->dir);
>>> +             __unmap_dma_buf(attach, attach->sgt, attach->dir);
>>>
>>>                if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf)) {
>>>                        dma_buf_unpin(attach);
>>> @@ -924,7 +965,7 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>>                }
>>>        }
>>>
>>> -     sg_table = attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
>>> +     sg_table = __map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
>>>        if (!sg_table)
>>>                sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>>
>>> @@ -987,7 +1028,7 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>>        if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf))
>>>                dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>>>
>>> -     attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
>>> +     __unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
>>>
>>>        if (dma_buf_is_dynamic(attach->dmabuf) &&
>>>            !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_MOVE_NOTIFY))
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> index 628681bf6c99..efdc56b9d95f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
>>> @@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
>>>         * On failure, returns a negative error value wrapped into a pointer.
>>>         * May also return -EINTR when a signal was received while being
>>>         * blocked.
>>> +      *
>>> +      * Note that exporters should not try to cache the scatter list, or
>>> +      * return the same one for multiple calls. Caching is done either by the
>>> +      * DMA-BUF code (for non-dynamic importers) or the importer. Ownership
>>> +      * of the scatter list is transferred to the caller, and returned by
>>> +      * @unmap_dma_buf.
>>>         */
>>>        struct sg_table * (*map_dma_buf)(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
>>>                                         enum dma_data_direction);
>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-15 13:02 [PATCH] drm-buf: Add debug option Daniel Vetter
2021-01-15 13:09 ` [Linaro-mm-sig] " Christian König
2021-01-15 13:22   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-15 13:24     ` Christian König [this message]
2021-01-15 15:36 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-15 15:50 ` [PATCH] dma-buf: " Daniel Vetter
2021-01-15 15:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-15 16:20   ` Christian König
2021-01-15 16:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-01-15 18:52   ` Christian König
2021-01-18 13:27     ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e11a28c6-197a-c181-b704-da9debd1f938@amd.com \
    --to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stevensd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox