From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@collabora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Collabora Kernel Team <kernel@collabora.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] media: dt-bindings: rockchip,rk3568-mipi-csi2: add rk3588 compatible
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 09:50:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eaec4b1c-469c-4f81-884b-3308aa85633f@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260307-complex-finicky-skua-bf52bd@quoll>
Hi Krzysztof,
On 3/7/26 16:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 03:09:48PM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
>> The RK3588 MIPI CSI-2 receivers are compatible to the ones found in
>> the RK3568. However, their integration in the respective SoC may be
>> different when it comes to the (currently not implemented) split
>
> All this says they are compatible, so express it.
..express it... how exactly? In the commit message? Or what do you mean
exactly?
>> DPHY feature. Therefore, add the RK3588 compatible to allow for
>> future differentiation.
>
> This I do not understand. If you just copy standard rules from
> writing-bindings, then no, don't do that. It's obvious and there is
> never a need to repeat any standard/common rule. If you want to say
> devices are not compatible, then say that explicitly.
It's a bit of a complicated story. To keep it short, the RK3568 and the
RK3588 MIPI CSI-2 receivers are compatible at least right now. In
future, this may or may not change. This depends on how this split DPHY
integration is implemented -- and we won't know that for some time.
Right now I expect that the phys property will become optional when this
happens (at least for the RK3568).
What is the safe bet here? Going for a fallback compatible and adjust
everything when the split DPHY feature is implemented?
Best regards,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-06 14:09 [PATCH 0/4] media: synopsys: csi2rx: add support for rk3588 variant Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2026-03-06 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] media: dt-bindings: rockchip,rk3568-mipi-csi2: add rk3588 compatible Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2026-03-07 15:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-09 8:50 ` Michael Riesch [this message]
2026-03-09 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-09 15:44 ` Frank Li
2026-03-06 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] media: synopsys: csi2rx: add support for rk3588 variant Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2026-03-07 15:35 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-06 14:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add mipi csi-2 receiver nodes to rk3588 Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2026-03-06 14:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: defconfig: enable designware mipi csi-2 receiver Michael Riesch via B4 Relay
2026-03-07 15:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-09 9:02 ` Michael Riesch
2026-03-09 9:11 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eaec4b1c-469c-4f81-884b-3308aa85633f@collabora.com \
--to=michael.riesch@collabora.com \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox