From: Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix deadlock if uvc_status_stop is called from async_ctrl.work
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 15:36:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f1ba0045-b3b0-4098-971c-5385644bf82e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6d1ac9cc-a7ff-4a1f-9ed0-000917a2cf8c@linux.dev>
Hi,
On 24-Mar-26 18:38, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 3/23/26 19:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:58:22AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> If a UVC camera has an asynchronous control, uvc_status_stop may be
>>> called from async_ctrl.work:
>>>
>>> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
>>> uvc_ctrl_status_event()
>>> uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
>>> uvc_pm_put()
>>> uvc_status_put()
>>> uvc_status_stop()
>>> cancel_work_sync()
>>>
>>> This will cause a deadlock, since cancel_work_sync will wait for
>>> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work to complete before returning.
>>>
>>> Fix this by returning early from uvc_status_stop if we are currently in
>>> the work function. flush_status now remains false until uvc_status_start
>>> is called again, ensuring that uvc_ctrl_status_event_work won't resubmit
>>> the URB.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a32d9c41bdb8 ("media: uvcvideo: Make power management granular")
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6733bdfb-3e88-479f-8956-ab09c04c433e@linux.dev/
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Update comments with review feedback
>>> - Use flush_work instead of cancel_work_sync since the work should never
>>> be rescheduled.
>>>
>>> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
>>> index 231cfee8e7c2c..ea45b11642e59 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_status.c
>>> @@ -316,6 +316,15 @@ static int uvc_status_start(struct uvc_device *dev, gfp_t flags)
>>> if (!dev->int_urb)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * If the work called uvc_status_stop it may still be running. Wait for
>>> + * it to finish before we submit the urb.
>>> + */
>>> + flush_work(&dev->async_ctrl.work);
>>
>> I assume the only way this can happen is for uvc_status_start() to run
>> after the uvc_status_put() call in
>>
>> uvc_ctrl_status_event_work()
>> uvc_ctrl_status_event()
>> uvc_ctrl_clear_handle()
>> uvc_pm_put()
>> uvc_status_put()
>>
>> returns. Is that right ? If so I'd like to capture that better in the
>> comment, as I have a feeling we'll need to revisit this code at some
>> point.
>>
>> /*
>> * If the previous uvc_status_stop() call was from the async work, the
>> * work may still be running. Wait for it to finish before we submit the
>> * urb.
>> */
>>
>> And if that's not correct, there's something I don't get and a better
>> comment is even more important :-)
>>
>> If the above change is fine, I can update the comment when applying, and
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Fine by me
Thank you everyone.
I've merged this in my local uvc/for-next branch with Laurent's updated
comment and with Laurent's and Ricardo's Reviewed-by added.
I'll push this out to gitlab for CI later today.
Regards,
Hans
>
>> This being said, I wonder if we could have a simpler implementation if
>> we always stopped the work and URB when the last userspace user goes
>> away, instead of keeping the device active until we get the asynchronous
>> control notification.
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* Clear the flush status if we were previously stopped. */
>>> + smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
>>> +
>>> return usb_submit_urb(dev->int_urb, flags);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -336,6 +345,15 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
>>> */
>>> smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, true);
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * If we are called from the event work function, the URB is guaranteed
>>> + * to not be in flight as it has completed and has not been resubmitted.
>>> + * There's no need to cancel the work (which would deadlock), or to kill
>>> + * the URB.
>>> + */
>>> + if (current_work() == &w->work)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Cancel any pending asynchronous work. If any status event was queued,
>>> * process it synchronously.
>>> @@ -354,15 +372,6 @@ static void uvc_status_stop(struct uvc_device *dev)
>>> */
>>> if (cancel_work_sync(&w->work))
>>> uvc_ctrl_status_event(w->chain, w->ctrl, w->data);
>>> -
>>> - /*
>>> - * From this point, there are no events on the queue and the status URB
>>> - * is dead. No events will be queued until uvc_status_start() is called.
>>> - * The barrier is needed to make sure that flush_status is visible to
>>> - * uvc_ctrl_status_event_work() when uvc_status_start() will be called
>>> - * again.
>>> - */
>>> - smp_store_release(&dev->flush_status, false);
>>> }
>>>
>>> int uvc_status_resume(struct uvc_device *dev)
>>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-16 15:58 [PATCH v2] media: uvcvideo: Fix deadlock if uvc_status_stop is called from async_ctrl.work Sean Anderson
2026-03-20 9:17 ` Ricardo Ribalda
2026-03-23 23:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-03-24 17:38 ` Sean Anderson
2026-05-11 13:36 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f1ba0045-b3b0-4098-971c-5385644bf82e@kernel.org \
--to=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=hverkuil@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=ribalda@chromium.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox