From: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: valentina.manea.m@gmail.com, shuah@kernel.org, i@zenithal.me,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Zijie Zhao <zzjas98@gmail.com>,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [drivers/usb/usbip] BUG: corrupted list in vep_queue
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 16:56:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7d4a151-81ff-4367-aa2e-b39c30db3d31@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <73247327-5bc2-4390-a60d-a73e5683f0a6@linuxfoundation.org>
On 10/11/24 11:05, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/11/24 10:21, Chenyuan Yang wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I'm curious about the best approach to fix this issue. I'm unsure if
>> adding a spinlock or mutex around the code would be good to ensure
>> that only one thread can modify the list at a time (then fix this
>> issue).
>>
>> Alternatively, we could check if the entry is already in the list
>> within the vep_queue function:
>> ```
>> if (!list_empty(&new_entry->list)) {
>> // Entry is already in the list, handle it (e.g., log an error or ignore)
>> return -EEXIST; // Or another appropriate error code
>> }
>>
>
> vep_queue() function is holding udc lock when it updates
> the status and calls list_add_tail(). vep_dequeue() does
> the same.
>
> vep_free_request() doesn't see to hold the udc lock. I will
> tale a look at this a bit more and get back to you on the
> best approach. My guess is that the fix will be in another
> function such as vep_free_request() - at the moment - that
> routine is the one I suspect.
>
>
Can you try adding udc lock hold in vep_free_request() and see
if the problem persists?
thanks,
-- Shuah
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-11 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-11 5:13 [drivers/usb/usbip] BUG: corrupted list in vep_queue Chenyuan Yang
2024-10-11 5:21 ` Greg KH
2024-10-11 16:21 ` Chenyuan Yang
2024-10-11 17:05 ` Shuah Khan
2024-10-11 22:56 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f7d4a151-81ff-4367-aa2e-b39c30db3d31@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chenyuan0y@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
--cc=zzjas98@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox