From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K0jrp-0000Cr-4S for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 23:04:29 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K0jrk-00020p-Sl for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:04:24 +0000 Received: from 213-140-22-66.fastres.net ([213.140.22.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:04:24 +0000 Received: from kaboom by 213-140-22-66.fastres.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 May 2008 21:04:24 +0000 To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org From: Francesco Schiavarelli Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:04:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] dvbnet not working anymore with 2.6.25 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: I've narrowed down the problem to kernel version 2.6.24. This is the output with # strace ifconfig dvb0_0 10.0.0.1 promisc up (WORKING) ... > open("/usr/share/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/net-tools.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > open("/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/net-tools.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFADDR, 0xbfc8e968) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_NOARP|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc8e85c) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_RUNNING|IFF_NOARP|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc8e85c) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_UP|IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_RUNNING|IFF_NOARP|IFF_PROMISC|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc8e85c) = 0 > exit_group(0) = ? > Process 24330 detached (NOT WORKING) ... > open("/usr/share/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/net-tools.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > open("/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/net-tools.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFADDR, 0xbfc59138) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_NOARP|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc5902c) = -1 EADDRNOTAVAIL (Cannot assign requested address) > dup(2) = 5 > fcntl64(5, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR) > fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 1), ...}) = 0 > mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7f3c000 > _llseek(5, 0, 0xbfc58a88, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > open("/usr/share/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > open("/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/libc.mo", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) > write(5, "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requ"..., 46SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address > ) = 46 > close(5) = 0 > munmap(0xb7f3c000, 4096) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_NOARP|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc5902c) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCGIFFLAGS, {ifr_name="dvb0_0", ifr_flags=IFF_BROADCAST|IFF_NOARP|IFF_PROMISC|IFF_MULTICAST}) = 0 > ioctl(4, SIOCSIFFLAGS, 0xbfc5902c) = -1 EADDRNOTAVAIL (Cannot assign requested address) > dup(2) = 5 > fcntl64(5, F_GETFL) = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR) > fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 1), ...}) = 0 > mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb7f3c000 > _llseek(5, 0, 0xbfc58a88, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > write(5, "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requ"..., 46SIOCSIFFLAGS: Cannot assign requested address > ) = 46 > close(5) = 0 > munmap(0xb7f3c000, 4096) = 0 > exit_group(-1) = ? > Process 2778 detached Not being a kernel hacker I was not able to investigate deeply the problem. Can it be related to new NAPI in /net/core/dev.c? I don't have a clue. Also no answers on this ml, so probably I'm alone with this problem. thanks, Francesco _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb