From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3O180Ft026081 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:08:00 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3O17jqV006571 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:07:46 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lx9tD-0000sO-6z for video4linux-list@redhat.com; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:07:39 +0000 Received: from static-71-168-37-170.hag.east.verizon.net ([71.168.37.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:07:39 +0000 Received: from ndbecker2 by static-71-168-37-170.hag.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 01:07:39 +0000 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com From: Neal Becker Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:07:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <412bdbff0904230647x8eb2b34u5ddebba380e70ade@mail.gmail.com> <20090423114955.724f5b48.b3782802@columbus.rr.com> <412bdbff0904231148s1817d0dcs311d09873bcc8c70@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Subject: Re: recommendation for hd atsc usb device? List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Samsung claims: >> "The new S5H1411 boasts a higher reception success rate than other >> devices in multi-path environments where signal interference is high, >> such as densely populated urban areas; dynamic environments with serious >> signal distortion among many moving vehicles; environments with major >> signal phase errors because of cable retransmission and remote areas >> where reception is generally poor." >> >> Well, at least they have their heart in the right place :) I have never >> been able to find real lab test results for ATSC reception performance. > > Unfortunately, the marketing material fora ll the vendors is going to > say crap like that. And nobody who has the equipment necessary to > objectively compare things like multipath performance across devices > are going to publish their findings due to competitive interests. > > Also, you cannot just look at the demod, the tuner itself is a factor > as well (and in some cases the pairing of the demod/tuner). > > Devin > Hate to tie up your ML with my questions, but just one more. Before I go ahead and order WinTV-HVR-1950, anyone know of any issue with using this on my fedora F10 system (kernel 2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.x86_64)? -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list