From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:45528 "EHLO khc.piap.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756013AbZLHP0x (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:26:53 -0500 From: Krzysztof Halasa To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Jon Smirl , hermann pitton , Christoph Bartelmus , awalls@radix.net, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, kraxel@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? References: <9e4733910912041628g5bedc9d2jbee3b0861aeb5511@mail.gmail.com> <1260070593.3236.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local> <20091206065512.GA14651@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4B1B99A5.2080903@redhat.com> <9e4733910912060952h4aad49dake8e8486acb6566bc@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910912061323x22c618ccyf6edcee5b021cbe3@mail.gmail.com> <4B1D934E.7030103@redhat.com> <20091208042340.GC11147@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4B1E3F7D.9070806@redhat.com> <4B1E5EFA.4020801@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:26:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4B1E5EFA.4020801@redhat.com> (Mauro Carvalho Chehab's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:13:14 -0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > The enable/disable protocol decoder enable/disable interface is needed anyway, > due to the needs for the hardware IR decoders Why do they need it exactly? The key tables say all they need I hope? -- Krzysztof Halasa