From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] of/device: Add a way to probe drivers by match data
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:56:40 -0800
Message-ID: <07ec49cb-e5b7-72bc-f563-2d2d7c2e2c0d@gmail.com>
References: <20181106183609.207702-1-sboyd@kernel.org>
 <20181106183609.207702-2-sboyd@kernel.org>
 <efa13e0b-0daf-3bf3-27ba-ed90f15c7dfe@gmail.com>
 <154169993998.88331.10494065577891939152@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <0f2bb386-ba92-544c-e980-c95309944b22@gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdWm2P8fa6d9vLhYtWHBe0uNPj9jfyL1rtmdLixPEi1rUg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWm2P8fa6d9vLhYtWHBe0uNPj9jfyL1rtmdLixPEi1rUg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org

On 11/9/18 2:36 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 11:29 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 08/11/2018 18:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Matthias Brugger (2018-11-08 00:29:46)
>>>> On 06/11/2018 19:36, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> +int platform_driver_probe_by_of_match_data(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     int (*probe_func)(struct platform_device *pdev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     probe_func = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't we check if probe_func is not NULL?
>>>
>>> Is the oops from the NULL pointer deref insufficient?
>>
>> Do you think we should crash the machine if someone uses the call wrongly? Or
>> should we provide the possibility to error out on the caller side?
> 
> I believe that would be a bug in the driver, to be discovered ASAP.
> So yes, please do crash ;-)

This is one of Linus' pet peeves.  He does not think crashing the
machine is the proper choice (as a general statement).

-Frank

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
>