From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mars Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: mediatek: add mt6580 basic support Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:15:08 +0800 Message-ID: <1435191308.28046.1.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <1433319533-24803-1-git-send-email-mars.cheng@mediatek.com> <3799922.TWv12CPu81@ubix> <1435147153.3792.9.camel@mtkswgap22> <2753320.5M4yQIm8Im@ubix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2753320.5M4yQIm8Im@ubix> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthias Brugger Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Yingjoe Chen , CC Hwang , Jades Shih , Loda Chou , Miles Chen , MY Chuang , Scott Shu List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 22:25 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 07:59:13 PM Mars Cheng wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 21:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > + soc { > > > > > > Please drop the soc node as well and just add the components directly. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matthias > > > > May I know the reason to remove the soc node? I follow other xxxx.dtsi > > to add this node. > > The device tree is reflecting the hardware, if you add a soc node like this, it > is seen like a bus, but there is not really a bus. > > I think point of view about this has change over time and nowadays it is > preferred not to add a soc node. > > Regards, > Matthias Got it. Will remove the soc node and prepare the new patch. Thanks a lot.