From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Koro Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: Increase periods_min in capture Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:39:49 +0800 Message-ID: <1443058789.22786.11.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1442213477-63721-1-git-send-email-koro.chen@mediatek.com> <1443002599.22786.2.camel@mtksdaap41> <20150923161253.GN30445@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150923161253.GN30445@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: tiwai@suse.de, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 09:12 -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 06:03:19PM +0800, Koro Chen wrote: > > Any suggestion for this patch? > > > > On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 14:51 +0800, Koro Chen wrote: > > > In capture, there is chance that hw_ptr reported at IRQ is > > > a little smaller than period_size due to internal AFE buffer. > > > In the case of ping-pong buffer: > > Please don't top post or send content free pings. I'm not entirely sure > what you're asking for here - the patch has been applied, what further > suggestions were you looking for? I am sorry about the top posting ping... will never do this again. OK thank you, now I see the patch is already in the tree, but I am sure I didn't get the mail titled "Applied xxx to the asoc tree", so I didn't know the patch status. Maybe something was wrong with the mail system?