From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Garlic Tseng Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: mediatek: add BT implementation Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 16:59:15 +0800 Message-ID: <1467709155.10413.7.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1467629788-14411-1-git-send-email-garlic.tseng@mediatek.com> <1467629788-14411-4-git-send-email-garlic.tseng@mediatek.com> <20160704144406.GH6247@sirena.org.uk> <1467683533.4212.16.camel@mtksdaap41> <20160705081232.GL6247@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160705081232.GL6247@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, ir.lian@mediatek.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, tiwai@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, koro.chen@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, PC.Liao@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 10:12 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:52:13AM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:44 +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > We really shouldn't be writing the registers or other internal data of > > > the device. Instead we should be getting the driver for the relevant > > > hardware component to do it. If we just write to registers that makes > > > the interoperation with the real driver for the device more fragile than > > > it should be, people might update the main driver without noticing the > > > external driver. > > > The AUDIO_TOP_CON4 is a reg of the ASoC hw module. All the registers > > which are set in the btmrg operator belong to ASoC hardware. The reg > > writing you mention above is to power up the MRG interface in the ASoC > > module. > > The problem is that this is the machine driver, not a driver for the > chip that's being controlled. The patch is for platform driver "mt2701-afe-pcm.c", which contorls the ASoC module, not for machine driver. Maybe the patch sequence is confusing and I'm sorry about that. Or did I misunderstand your comment?