Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Cc: John Crispin <blogic-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: MT7623 Wifi SoC support questions
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:44:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14968847.0a6uI5oGvX@ubix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5593C939.1020004-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>

On Wednesday, July 01, 2015 01:04:25 PM John Crispin wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I am currently busy making the linux-mediatek support work on the MT7623
> made by Mediatek/Ralink so we can add support to OpenWrt.
> 
> This SoC looks very similar to the MT8127. The main differences are that
> it uses a MT6232 pmic and has pcie/ethernet.
> 
> I already managed to get lots of drivers up and running based on what
> has been posted on this list. If do however have a few questions.

It's good to hear, that you can take profit out of this effort. It clearly shows 
the value of getting a SoC mainline.

> 
> * I noticed that ARM_ARCH_TIMER is not selected in v4.1 If I only
> register the mtk_timer, SMP comes up but the 3 extra cores seem to get
> no timer irqs and the whole system seems to run very slow. Selecting
> ARM_ARCH_TIMER makes the system boot fine. Is mtk_timer enough for other
> MTK SoCs to work ?

I think the basic problem, at least with mt6589 was, that the cntfreq register 
was not set correctly by the bootloader, which made the ARM_ARCH_TIMER 
unusable.

Apart from that I think, the ARM_ARCH_TIMER will get turned off in some deep 
idle state, so that you need mtk_timer (I'm not sure if this holds for mt7623 
as well).

> 
> * The MT7623 has a 7 port PWM that looks different to the display-pwm
> driver that was posted. This PWM has an old and new mode. Oldmode looks
> like classic period/duty cyle config, while the new mode has lots of
> complexe features. the kernel PWM subsystem can only handle oldmode
> style config right now so i was going to add a driver. is anyone working
> on this already ? is this core mt7623 specific or do other SoCs have it
> aswell ? The registers i have here are called PWMX_CON, PWMX_HDURATION,
> PWMX_LDURATION, PWMX_GDURATION ....
> 

I it seems that this PWM is present in other SoCs as well.

Best regards,
Matthias

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-03 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-01 11:04 MT7623 Wifi SoC support questions John Crispin
     [not found] ` <5593C939.1020004-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
2015-07-03 13:44   ` Matthias Brugger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14968847.0a6uI5oGvX@ubix \
    --to=matthias.bgg-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=blogic-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox