From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fixed static checker warning in clk_cpumux_get_parent call
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:15:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499915747.16278.30.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712231726.GQ22780@codeaurora.org>
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 16:17 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/11, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > index edd8e69..c6a3a1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ static inline struct mtk_clk_cpumux *to_mtk_clk_cpumux(struct clk_hw *_hw)
> > static u8 clk_cpumux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > {
> > struct mtk_clk_cpumux *mux = to_mtk_clk_cpumux(hw);
> > - int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> > unsigned int val;
> >
> > regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->reg, &val);
> > @@ -35,17 +34,18 @@ static u8 clk_cpumux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > val >>= mux->shift;
> > val &= mux->mask;
> >
> > - if (val >= num_parents)
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
>
> Yeah we really need to fix the get_parent() op to return a
> clk_hw pointer instead. Time for another migration plan...
>
Agreed
Using clk_hw pointer as returned type is better
otherwise, core driver strongly depends on raw value from hardware
which easily breaks core driver's logic
> > return val;
> > }
> >
> > static int clk_cpumux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> > {
> > struct mtk_clk_cpumux *mux = to_mtk_clk_cpumux(hw);
> > + int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> > u32 mask, val;
> >
> > + if (index >= num_parents)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> When would we call this function with an invalid index? The
> framework should be making sure to only call it with an index
> that's valid. So perhaps this hunk can be left out?
>
O.K. the hunk will be left out
core driver handles everything well when the appropriate number of
parents is registered.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-13 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-11 2:43 [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fixed static checker warning in clk_cpumux_get_parent call sean.wang
2017-07-12 23:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-13 3:15 ` Sean Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1499915747.16278.30.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox