Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fixed static checker warning in clk_cpumux_get_parent call
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:15:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1499915747.16278.30.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170712231726.GQ22780@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 16:17 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/11, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > index edd8e69..c6a3a1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-cpumux.c
> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ static inline struct mtk_clk_cpumux *to_mtk_clk_cpumux(struct clk_hw *_hw)
> >  static u8 clk_cpumux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  {
> >  	struct mtk_clk_cpumux *mux = to_mtk_clk_cpumux(hw);
> > -	int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> >  	unsigned int val;
> >  
> >  	regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->reg, &val);
> > @@ -35,17 +34,18 @@ static u8 clk_cpumux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >  	val >>= mux->shift;
> >  	val &= mux->mask;
> >  
> > -	if (val >= num_parents)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> 
> Yeah we really need to fix the get_parent() op to return a
> clk_hw pointer instead. Time for another migration plan...
> 

Agreed

Using clk_hw pointer as returned type is better

otherwise, core driver strongly depends on raw value from hardware  

which easily breaks core driver's logic

> >  	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int clk_cpumux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> >  {
> >  	struct mtk_clk_cpumux *mux = to_mtk_clk_cpumux(hw);
> > +	int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
> >  	u32 mask, val;
> >  
> > +	if (index >= num_parents)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> When would we call this function with an invalid index? The
> framework should be making sure to only call it with an index
> that's valid. So perhaps this hunk can be left out?
> 

O.K. the hunk will be left out

core driver handles everything well when the appropriate number of
parents is registered.







> 



      reply	other threads:[~2017-07-13  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-11  2:43 [PATCH] clk: mediatek: fixed static checker warning in clk_cpumux_get_parent call sean.wang
2017-07-12 23:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-07-13  3:15   ` Sean Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1499915747.16278.30.camel@mtkswgap22 \
    --to=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox