From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sean Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: Fix all warnings for missing struct clk_onecell_data Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 23:47:21 +0800 Message-ID: <1514044041.30687.16.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <20171223122002.2cb629d1@endymion> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171223122002.2cb629d1@endymion> Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com, weiyi.lu@mediatek.com, arnd@arndb.de, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 12:20 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Sean, > > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 15:56:36 +0800, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Sean Wang > > > > In fact, the clk-mtk.h header is unnecessary for reset.c and thus it's > > safe to remove it from the file to get rid of below build warnings. > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > In file included from drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c:22:0: > > >>drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h:44:19: warning: 'struct clk_onecell_data' > > declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of > > this definition or declaration > > int num, struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h:63:19: warning: 'struct clk_onecell_data' > > declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of > > this definition or declaration > > int num, struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h:145:10: warning: 'struct clk_onecell_data' > > declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of > > this definition or declaration > > struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h:164:11: warning: 'struct clk_onecell_data' > > declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of > > this definition or declaration > > struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mtk.h:190:12: warning: 'struct clk_onecell_data' > > declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this > > definition or declaration > > struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > That's not the proper fix. The actual problem here is in clk-mtk.h, > which declares functions which need struct clk_onecell_data without > declaring that structure first. This can be fixed in 2 ways: > > 1* #Include whatever header file provides the definition of struct > clk_onecell_data (I think ) in clk-mtk.h > itself. > > 2* As you only manipulate pointers and not the structure itself, you > could simply declare that this struct exists, without defining it, > prior to referencing it in clk-mtk.h. As easy as: > > struct clk_onecell_data; > > In this case option 1 seems preferable. > > The reason why the problem is only visible in reset.c is because other > source files under drivers/clk/mediatek #include > explicitly before #including clk-mtk.h. But it only works "by > accident". Ideally header files should be self-sufficient, so you don't > depend on #include order. > agreed on above. I also prefer using option 1 to solve original issue. > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang > > Cc: kbuild-all@01.org > > Cc: Stephen Boyd > > Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c | 2 -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > index d3551d5..70ebb2e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/reset.c > > @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ > > #include > > #include > > > > -#include "clk-mtk.h" > > - > > struct mtk_reset { > > struct regmap *regmap; > > int regofs; > > If the header file is indeed not needed then that's still a good > change, even if it doesn't fix the problem, so: > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare > However the patch description should be adjusted accordingly. I will use another patch to remove the indeed not needed header thanks a lot for your detailed explanation and help Sean