From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chuanjia Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] eint: add gpio vritual number select Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:24:37 +0800 Message-ID: <1545045877.15380.8.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1544693783-25079-1-git-send-email-chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com> <1545016504.29293.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> <1545019482.27863.8.camel@mtksdaap41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1545019482.27863.8.camel@mtksdaap41> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yingjoe Chen Cc: Sean Wang , youlin.pei@mediatek.com, hongkun.cao@mediatek.com, zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com, Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, hailong.fan@mediatek.com, Matthias Brugger , eddie.huang@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 12:04 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 11:15 +0800, Chuanjia Liu wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 11:33 -0800, Sean Wang wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 1:36 AM wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Chuanjia Liu > > > > > > > > This patch add gpio vritual number select,avoid virtual gpio set SMT. > > > > > > s/gpio/GPIO/ > > > s/vritual/virtual/ > > > > > > Virtual GPIOs you said here that means these pins only used inside SoC > > > and not being exported to outside SoC, right? It seems this kind of > > > pins doesn't need SMT. > > > > > Yes,virtual gpio only used inside SOC and these pins doesn't need set > > SMT > > Hi, > > I don't see full patch in linux-mediatek archive. Maybe you are not > subscribed so it is rejected? Some groups failed to send because of permission issues,I will update new patch. > > Please add this description to commit message and/or code comment. > I think 'internal GPIO' might be a better name for this. Does the name > 'virtual GPIO' come from datasheet? MTKer call it virtyal gpio When some pins only used inside soc. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuanjia Liu > > > > --- > > > > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h | 1 + > > > > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8183.c | 1 + > > > > drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 9 ++++++--- > > > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h > > > > index 48468d0..c16beaf 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h > > > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct mtk_eint_hw { > > > > u8 ports; > > > > unsigned int ap_num; > > > > unsigned int db_cnt; > > > > + unsigned int vir_start; > Since it is about GPIO and SMT, maybe it should be added to mtk_pin_soc > instead of mtk_eint_hw ? > > Joe.C I will delete this change,thanks > > > > }; > > > > > > > > struct mtk_eint; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8183.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8183.c > > > > index 6262fd3..bbeafd3 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8183.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8183.c > > > > @@ -497,6 +497,7 @@ > > > > .ports = 6, > > > > .ap_num = 212, > > > > .db_cnt = 13, > > > > + .vir_start = 180, > > > > }; > > > > > > > > static const struct mtk_pin_soc mt8183_data = { > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > > > index 4a9e0d4..ca3bae1 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c > > > > @@ -289,9 +289,12 @@ static int mtk_xt_set_gpio_as_eint(void *data, unsigned long eint_n) > > > > if (err) > > > > return err; > > > > > > > > - err = mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_SMT, MTK_ENABLE); > > > > - if (err) > > > > - return err; > > > > + if (gpio_n < hw->eint->hw->vir_start) { > > > > + err = mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_SMT, > > > > + MTK_ENABLE); > > > > + if (err) > > > > + return err; > > > > + } > > > > > > The changes will break these SoCs without a properly configured vir_start. > > > > > > If SMT seems unnecessary for these kinds of virtual GPIOs pin in the > > > path, we can do it as > > > > > > err = mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_SMT, > > > MTK_ENABLE); > > > /* please add comments for the exclusion condition */ > > > if (err && err != -ENOTSUPP) > > > return err; > > > > > > If there is getting much special on certain pins between SoCs, and > > > then we can consider creating a desc->flag to split logic. > > > > Yes,SMT unnecessary for these kinds of virtual GPIOS pin in the path,if > > do it as > > err = mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_SMT, > > MTK_ENABLE); > > if (err && err != -ENOTSUPP) > > return err; > > I wonder if system will lose -ENOTSUPP information when smt was not > > successfully set by real gpio? > > > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > -- > > > > 1.7.9.5 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek > >