Re: [PATCH v5 13/20] iommu/mediatek: Add mt8183 IOMMU support

Yong Wu
2019-01-31T03:19:51Z

On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:31 -0800, Evan Green wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > The M4U IP blocks in mt8183 is MediaTek's generation2 M4U which use
> > the ARM Short-descriptor like mt8173, and most of the HW registers
> > are the same.
> >
> > Here list main differences between mt8183 and mt8173/mt2712:
> > 1) mt8183 has only one M4U HW like mt8173 while mt2712 has two.
> > 2) mt8183 don't have the "bclk" clock, it use the EMI clock instead.
> > 3) mt8183 can support the dram over 4GB, but it doesn't call this "4GB
> > mode".
> > 4) mt8183 pgtable base register(0x0) extend bit[1:0] which represent
> > the bit[33:32] in the physical address of the pgtable base, But the
> > standard ttbr0[1] means the S bit which is enabled defaultly, Hence,
> > we add a mask.
> > 5) mt8183 HW has a GALS modules, SMI should enable "has_gals" support.
> > 6) mt8183 need reset_axi like mt8173.
> > 7) the larb-id in smi-common is remapped. M4U should add its larbid_remap.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 1 +
> > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index 2913ddb..66e3615 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> > #include "mtk_iommu.h"
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR 0x000
> > +#define MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(31, 7)
> >
> > #define REG_MMU_INVALIDATE 0x020
> > #define F_ALL_INVLD 0x2
> > @@ -342,7 +343,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > /* Update the pgtable base address register of the M4U HW */
> > if (!data->m4u_dom) {
> > data->m4u_dom = dom;
> > - writel(dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0],
> > + writel(dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr[0] & MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK,
>
> So there aren't any other bits down below 7 that you need, like the
> shareable bits?

Yes. We don't need all the bits down below 7. As the comment 4) above,
we mask it just because the S bit.