From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: biao huang Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] net-next: stmmac: add mdio clause 45 access from mac device for dwmac4 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:58:43 +0800 Message-ID: <1556614723.24897.33.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1556519724-1576-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1556519724-1576-3-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B46E5B4@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Ong, Boon Leong" Cc: Jose Abreu , "davem@davemloft.net" , Andrew Lunn , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.com" , Kweh, List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 15:23 +0000, Ong, Boon Leong wrote: > >> What is the preference of the driver maintainer here? > > > >Your implementation doesn't need the mdelay() so I think we should follow > >your way once you also address the review comments from Andrew and me. > > > >Maybe you can coordinate with Biao and submit a C45 implementation that > >can be tested by both ? > > Ok. We will address the review comments for that patch-series and resend the > v3 patch-series soonest and for Biao to test. > I'll test it when your patch is ready. Please cc me, thanks. > Thanks