Linux-mediatek Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jjian zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Chaotian Jing (井朝天)" <Chaotian.Jing@mediatek.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Yong Mao (毛勇)" <yong.mao@mediatek.com>,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO IRQ interrupt handle flow
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 13:57:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1560751020.3103.25.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFrXU4bpKeB7Aa15j2nHqUCn-bk+YKn9_vkznmi+PS8H7A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 17:46 +0800, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 07:26, Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: jjian zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> >
> > SDIO IRQ is triggered by low level. It need disable SDIO IRQ
> > detected function. Otherwise the interrupt register can't be cleared.
> > It will process the interrupt more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jjian Zhou <jjian.zhou@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Mao <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 13 +++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > index c518cc2..29992ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > @@ -1389,10 +1389,12 @@ static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
> >         struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> >
> >         spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> > -       if (enb)
> > +       if (enb) {
> >                 sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
> > -       else
> > +               sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
> > +       } else {
> >                 sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
> 
> Rather than clearing SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE in the irq handler, you need to
> do it here. As otherwise when the mmc core calls
> host->ops->enable_sdio_irq() to disable the SDIO IRQ, it may stay
> enabled.
> 

Thank you for your review.

I remove the spin lock in "__msdc_enable_sdio_irq" and add 
spin lock in "msdc_enable_sdio_irq". The modification of
"__msdc_enable_sdio_irq" and "msdc_enable_sdio_irq" is as following.

static void __msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct msdc_host *host, int enb)
{
	if (enb) {
		sdr_set_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
		sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
	} else {
		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_INTEN, MSDC_INTEN_SDIOIRQ);
		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
	}
}

static void msdc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enb)
{
	unsigned long flags;
	struct msdc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);;
	__msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, enb);
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);

	if (enb)
		pm_runtime_get_noresume(host->dev);
	else
		pm_runtime_get_noidle(host->dev);
}

> > +       }
> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1422,6 +1424,8 @@ static irqreturn_t msdc_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >                 spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
> >                 events = readl(host->base + MSDC_INT);
> >                 event_mask = readl(host->base + MSDC_INTEN);
> > +               if ((events & event_mask) & MSDC_INT_SDIOIRQ)
> > +                       sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
> 
> As stated above, I suggest you move this into __msdc_enable_sdio_irq()
> and thus call that function from here instead. Well, that doesn't work
> as is, because of the spin lock, so you rather need to make a
> sub-function of __msdc_enable_sdio_irq, that don't take/releases the
> lock.
> 
> I hope that was clear. If not, I can post a patch to show you what I mean.
> 

I also modify this part handler in msdc_irq.

	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
	events = readl(host->base + MSDC_INT);
	event_mask = readl(host->base + MSDC_INTEN);
	if ((events & event_mask) & MSDC_INT_SDIOIRQ)
		__msdc_enable_sdio_irq(host, 0);
	/* clear interrupts */
	writel(events & event_mask, host->base + MSDC_INT);

	mrq = host->mrq;
	cmd = host->cmd;
	data = host->data;
	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);

	if ((events & event_mask) & MSDC_INT_SDIOIRQ)
		sdio_signal_irq(host->mmc);

I also will add spin lock in the "msdc_ack_sdio_irq".

Looking forward to your suggestions.
> 
> >                 /* clear interrupts */
> >                 writel(events & event_mask, host->base + MSDC_INT);
> >
> > @@ -1572,10 +1576,7 @@ static void msdc_init_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
> >         sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIO);
> >
> >         /* Config SDIO device detect interrupt function */
> > -       if (host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_SDIO_IRQ)
> > -               sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
> > -       else
> > -               sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
> > +       sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_SDIOIDE);
> >
> >         /* Configure to default data timeout */
> >         sdr_set_field(host->base + SDC_CFG, SDC_CFG_DTOC, 3);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17  5:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14  5:26 [PATCH 1/2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO IRQ interrupt handle flow Jjian Zhou
2019-06-14  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO IRQ detection issue Jjian Zhou
2019-06-14  9:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: mediatek: fix SDIO IRQ interrupt handle flow Ulf Hansson
2019-06-17  5:57   ` jjian zhou [this message]
2019-06-17  7:47     ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1560751020.3103.25.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
    --to=jjian.zhou@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Chaotian.Jing@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox