From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryder Lee Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fix many checkpatch.pl warnings Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:22:42 +0800 Message-ID: <1563938562.9134.1.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <8736ixrvhb.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8736ixrvhb.fsf-5ukZ45wKbUHoml4zekdYB16hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: Sean Wang , YF Luo , linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Yiwei Chung , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Roy Luo , Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 11:44 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ryder Lee writes: > > > This gathers many subsets to fix checkpatch.pl warnings. > > Thanks, this is much better now. > > > I still keep some warnings there due to readability. > > (The most of them are - networking block comments or 80 characters limit) > > I do the same in ath10k. BTW, here's my simple script which I use to > filter unwanted checkpatch warnings etc: > > https://github.com/qca/qca-swiss-army-knife/blob/master/tools/scripts/ath10k/ath10k-check > It's really useful! Thanks Ryder