From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF14BC32771 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919442465B for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="FzzW496t"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="lFTMEXVl" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 919442465B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=grXrQ+7A6tPxgJpNJWfKA+TjsaDIbpx1DHTjMdzBwKI=; b=FzzW496tlznXM3 ZN9i6OdcfLwi+tGj3CTtai+w2jgdXK2JEZia90xmAf3Gx1dm7ElzpoegQ1Zn1d3cb+2XcJeIyL0lO U1kiyfMizYTWFpt9JT8Ue28FZlzkQWh65d7mFUTeipD7FiS69ukRFqZ1SqVgyP3o9pKfjcKQOrwtp Z4oW5zbp2x49UjPU3cvTMOHM4AF3Q4gutvEAyUkVNJ9fM6L4ekcYL36oKi2EKl50JkRFCGc3bJwM7 JHvvcnd2a7zNj9NqSSA5xmhNKs8+sWiguqi/mVPMzd+Rpz2EXVBavd2QrA0+ic3Dla71N8se86Vgv OI7hjHA5X09M16qpAh9g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iuA2x-000283-BV; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:03:27 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iuA2t-000261-Vs for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:03:25 +0000 X-UUID: 554d79960e4b486ab068cdadc689d979-20200121 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From; bh=Bkkv2SlP/58V7+P3Bi8i3ZC64d86zcDO203xGyHiNBg=; b=lFTMEXVlMJsyXXM9Pka6P0VqG6juX++DUWU+D3/25oO25OqA2jQgoRA+zsaekCDW/etkHGAkwXvqTqnyCg1tgKwH0tfoYzfryc1kGrCPeycSRSlDOs9Cqkworb8FtYi4HKwkSwM1Oofb2O6QyFkkEQBZvNRcG46Co+iCorZKc/o=; X-UUID: 554d79960e4b486ab068cdadc689d979-20200121 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 636956114; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 23:03:20 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS02N2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 22:53:17 -0800 Received: from mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.84) by mtkmbs02n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:52:13 +0800 Received: from mtkswgap22.mediatek.inc (172.21.77.33) by mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:51:57 +0800 From: To: Subject: [PATCH v8 1/6] pinctrl: mediatek: Check gpio pin number and use binary search in mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:53:09 +0800 Message-ID: <1579675994-7001-1-git-send-email-light.hsieh@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.1.dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 660429F95FABC97ED3652C11CAB95C6BF2D0D521B77C9A655959A16674A913DA2000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200121_230324_030667_FC0471AB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: sean.wang@kernel.org, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Light Hsieh , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Light Hsieh 1. Check if gpio pin number is in valid range to prevent from get invalid pointer 'desc' in the following code: desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; 2. Improve mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() 2.1 Modify mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() to use binary search for accelerating search. 2.2 Correct message after the following check fail: if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) { rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field]; The original message is: "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n" However, the check is on soc chip level, not on pin level yet. So the message is corrected as: "Not support field %d for this soc\n" Signed-off-by: Light Hsieh --- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++------ drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c index 20e1c89..d63e05e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c @@ -68,32 +68,44 @@ static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, { const struct mtk_pin_field_calc *c, *e; const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc; + int start = 0, end, check; + bool found = false; u32 bits; if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) { rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field]; } else { dev_dbg(hw->dev, - "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n", - field, desc->number, desc->name); + "Not support field %d for this soc\n", field); return -ENOTSUPP; } + end = rc->nranges - 1; c = rc->range; e = c + rc->nranges; - while (c < e) { - if (desc->number >= c->s_pin && desc->number <= c->e_pin) + while (start <= end) { + check = (start + end) >> 1; + if (desc->number >= rc->range[check].s_pin + && desc->number <= rc->range[check].e_pin) { + found = true; + break; + } else if (start == end) break; - c++; + else if (desc->number < rc->range[check].s_pin) + end = check - 1; + else + start = check + 1; } - if (c >= e) { + if (!found) { dev_dbg(hw->dev, "Not support field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n", field, desc->number, desc->name); return -ENOTSUPP; } + c = rc->range + check; + if (c->i_base > hw->nbase - 1) { dev_err(hw->dev, "Invalid base for field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n", @@ -182,6 +194,9 @@ int mtk_hw_set_value(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc, if (err) return err; + if (value < 0 || value > pf.mask) + return -EINVAL; + if (!pf.next) mtk_rmw(hw, pf.index, pf.offset, pf.mask << pf.bitpos, (value & pf.mask) << pf.bitpos); diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c index 923264d..3e13ae7 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, int val, val2, err, reg, ret = 1; const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; + if (pin >= hw->soc->npins) + return -EINVAL; desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; switch (param) { @@ -206,6 +208,10 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin, int err = 0; u32 reg; + if (pin >= hw->soc->npins) { + err = -EINVAL; + goto err; + } desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin]; switch ((u32)param) { @@ -693,6 +699,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; int value, err; + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins) + return -EINVAL; + desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DIR, &value); @@ -708,6 +717,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; int value, err; + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins) + return -EINVAL; + desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DI, &value); @@ -722,6 +734,9 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip); const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc; + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins) + return; + desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DO, !!value); @@ -729,12 +744,22 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) static int mtk_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio) { + struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins) + return -EINVAL; + return pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip->base + gpio); } static int mtk_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value) { + struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip); + + if (gpio > hw->soc->npins) + return -EINVAL; + mtk_gpio_set(chip, gpio, value); return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip->base + gpio); -- 1.8.1.1.dirty _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek