From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5252C433E2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F01920708 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="RUH5SJLy"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="VjtBL01j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3F01920708 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jDY0UldK5oHu4uZAiXCAotxAGHf5qbqAqPWuejMfXec=; b=RUH5SJLyChRHz2Pg3ZLKYUwGN BCJF56r+1H0EwNtT66oylj1lTPbuZuKgXFvraUlj4Pbece41MjWEEgeTcf06O3cuVFv/CSn64/ksf hCXZA8KeElLNp343WDC8oBjM5/aqGRuPKEtjDo0/XmSP7wgISDtkxQgM8VvBkDwynGFQZsi1FH0i/ MFJWZomnMYdRXLOerUWXI+aBuW/PzeNhMKsBON1vhUJ9PLsCRd0hUvMQ4mt1agbCgZ4hxxsWMqas/ Sr1Agl/lS0dpWbHjB0AX/2/dGy765zWMJdpJzCNA1BAUg5nQ+5AQV0vDXiG1c9p5wIohFu67JdUdE 6MFSilTGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kGGj1-0001EB-Un; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:10:32 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kGGiy-0001DY-0B for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:10:30 +0000 X-UUID: f31d41170c9d445f97ed86fd2e27fa59-20200909 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=qQ3o5wuN2rg8uyEANSJYR8YzzG9Gaxvo1A2sTkhF+DE=; b=VjtBL01j/HoBXflC5GlI+QlUTjud9emFvNHY1ZJq5wY5TPnDX0DrA0dAMn2YeH8262sE/pt5GH2zcs6H+rEm2EvEbV51k3i4iQpuYfj+7BkX9ki3ztgQ+yYcMUxmWSSNBsGB64xkUXFky1+gs0UeZbamElxF76eiTWXFtuP9A4g=; X-UUID: f31d41170c9d445f97ed86fd2e27fa59-20200909 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 256/256) with ESMTP id 1326224228; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 23:10:25 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:04:48 -0700 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by MTKMBS31N2.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:04:46 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:04:44 +0800 Message-ID: <1599721372.7466.15.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: Aw: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Split PCIe node to comply with hardware design From: Chuanjia Liu To: Frank Wunderlich Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:02:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20200721074915.14516-1-Chuanjia.Liu@mediatek.com> <1596440772.7361.35.camel@mhfsdcap03> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: 7D884D44EC4ED2C18A83C4ECE5BF2DBC5AB661AF82EEBCB6FFD4697B9FB981372000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200910_031028_806561_EC797802 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.07 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, Ryder Lee , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, yong.wu@mediatek.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 2020-09-08 at 08:13 +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > Hi, > > i don't see this Patchset in 5.9-rc4 > > is anything missing? > > regards Frank Thanks for ping this mail, mali list consider this patchset is SPAM because of my environmental problems. I have fixed this problem and send the V5 version. It can be seen correctly in linux-pci mail list. Now I guess the maintainer will help review and apply this. regards Chuanjia _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek