From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4921ECCA464 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date :Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=R4WIaVmgxMJzlsaERAlBqwLuDwVcuzfSzsQMDWtKV3E=; b=LNPWEErdEtmLbVa9936MjD8fHc GLyPqkiunWsZPXVOgxyLCgbeqRIKLpRuyw1A9msk9ONs/MqluaTWwu4pQTv2A8GsDOqsLawSwMQ96 +hQ/iT5rVwGnkivAhJTXJyhusn7fJ4/pK87OrDzkk0mqp809l12VDZk+IP/5s581fzH/QYXqRo1hb bb3mjXczBbAD/4M8j8nMyxQg+hOabhT4oqsf2T5DygjJUXG3ENL8atw7/q0T8CJvX6W8KrryywHsp KpkljgjcmJJHjMoqahzAF9odGuWc+o1t4OzHEEK7FhyruvV4ZecJZYTnx6S3fOUrQORHTq+FbZZeM zpqif39w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xHe5o-00000002SZA-1Hmi; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:12 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xHe5m-00000002SYu-3EMi; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:10 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A94560018; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 179381F000C4; Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792142349; bh=R4WIaVmgxMJzlsaERAlBqwLuDwVcuzfSzsQMDWtKV3E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=R7mT5XDP+2oPGJhvdpCOK/511QiGEeN7bLMU3Bip4mljZXwdc3HKRiTwWMfFBmVz2 9vtGszLeSkIP/MK3fmyTqmi9cKVNnR2QRVx9DbbTAMadPNqehqRznEwf6+9Sp+IJVg MpWw6qZ6dXuE8EBoHojDeqR5oZ27QVLUq3W+KuTxMJxenDFAx0PqyETroc4qYnxmwA GY1Xm+55yGbsADcEO4rubxIdYoEpU60CAaSyMnJV0Df1ApkkyJpak2t1mmfrr8EGdf At5nB8yiKDM+y9VEX9Hd6sAZwMqyXD2lsDLGrDSAtQU9mws+pJVi3bRKbJjxqKely6 tbfGRUPorGlGw== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Zhi-Jun You Cc: Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Sujuan Chen , Rex Lu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 0/5] net: ethernet: mtk_wed: misc fixes Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:19:08 +0000 Message-ID: <179214234859.408196.13768026652794039093@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261016-wedfix-v5-0-8b02e78fd34f@gmail.com> References: <20261016-wedfix-v5-0-8b02e78fd34f@gmail.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.