From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: mediatek: Increase periods_min in capture Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:11:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20150924171153.GW30445@sirena.org.uk> References: <1442213477-63721-1-git-send-email-koro.chen@mediatek.com> <1443002599.22786.2.camel@mtksdaap41> <20150923161253.GN30445@sirena.org.uk> <1443058789.22786.11.camel@mtksdaap41> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BxNWZcw0TMazIwHZ" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443058789.22786.11.camel@mtksdaap41> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Koro Chen Cc: tiwai@suse.de, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org --BxNWZcw0TMazIwHZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:39:49AM +0800, Koro Chen wrote: > OK thank you, now I see the patch is already in the tree, but I am sure > I didn't get the mail titled "Applied xxx to the asoc tree", so I didn't > know the patch status. Maybe something was wrong with the mail system? Possibly your mail system flagged it as spam? --BxNWZcw0TMazIwHZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWBC7WAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQ2rsH/iEhDwnc6qiRLDQy2jfW+ow0 NZRngzdgzKchqZXHSqQaph/Sm2JLkthv85XwVvOMspF+iyGFlWmmL+m5dCYxlHXw 14qdGhBIISPvSw+esBj+OsUdaUejjDVc2BIrW+RDlPI8uvmu7LmmQVV8uAoDXchd bqivQ+1WQA+ZlO/BexNzc73bQUgfQCcAc1kHoe/cscbZHHl+lFLs+NeUYaZUV7J8 3rrLbuTXBe90CQVpqgHCPDDVLVU8g+uIhacfF/mkPb5bUmZTT6hESoITOe+X501h N/HgVHCOrWTpKdOJczwbWpJ5hiHKrLesrXtfDnDwdjJNXDz+eDVJq3Q/5zreO98= =BPww -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BxNWZcw0TMazIwHZ--