From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] drm: Add Content Protection property Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:32:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20171207143203.696fc804@alans-desktop> References: <20171130030907.26848-1-seanpaul@chromium.org> <20171130030907.26848-2-seanpaul@chromium.org> <20171205102840.GB12982@amd> <20171205104538.b4fxdjad3c46koas@phenom.ffwll.local> <20171205173408.GA18425@amd> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+glpam-linux-mediatek=m.gmane.org-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Alex Deucher Cc: David Airlie , Intel Graphics Development , LKML , Maling list - DRI developers , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Pavel Machek , Daniel Vetter , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org\" "@fuzix.org, Sean Paul List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > How about for sensitive video streams in government offices where you > want to avoid a spy potentially tapping the cable to see the video > stream? Last time I checked HDCP did not meet government security requirements - which is hardly surprising since you can buy $10 boxes from China to de-hdcp video streams 8) Alan