From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stanislaw Gruszka Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] mt76: Kconfig and Makefile for mt76x0 driver Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 10:28:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20180801082844.GB4526@redhat.com> References: <1533040864-9026-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1533040864-9026-13-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <8736vy1r0j.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8736vy1r0j.fsf-5ukZ45wKbUHoml4zekdYB16hYfS7NtTn@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , Felix Fietkau , Hans Ulli Kroll , Jakub Kicinski , Michal Schmidt , linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Stanislaw Gruszka writes: > > > Add Kconfig and Makefiles for mt76x0 driver. Now the driver > > can be build. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig | 7 +++++++ > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/Makefile > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > index 69906c733a1c..850611ad347a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/Kconfig > > @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ config MT76x2_COMMON > > tristate > > depends on MT76_CORE > > > > +config MT76x0U > > + tristate "MediaTek MT76x0U (USB) support" > > + depends on MAC80211 > > + depends on USB > > + help > > + This adds support for MT7610U-based wireless USB dongles. > > Does it make sense to add a Kconfig option for every mt76 device? I'm > worried that soon we have over a dozen of them. I can understand having > separate options to enable PCI or USB devices, but I don't see the > benefit for anything more finegrained than that. I think it does make sense for AP/home routers and other embedded devices. Stanislaw