From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tracing: Fix event_trace_printk loss on printk_format. Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:45:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20190213084511.45b86e15@gandalf.local.home> References: <1549971717-4693-1-git-send-email-mars.cheng@mediatek.com> <20190212204113.5ecaa2a1@gandalf.local.home> <1550033650.7648.2.camel@mtkswgap22> <1550040585.12645.9.camel@mtkswgap22> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1550040585.12645.9.camel@mtkswgap22> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mars Cheng Cc: Andress Kuo , CC Hwang , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:49:45 +0800 Mars Cheng wrote: > After some grep, I found event_trace_printk() not used in 5.0-rc*. But > trace_printk() is still used in several places. event_trace_printk() is an abomination, but trace_printk() is an extremely useful tool. Don't touch that! -- Steve