From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] wireless: mt76: call hweight8() instead of __sw_hweight8() Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:49:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20190218214940.GI4265@zn.tnic> References: <1550469571-25933-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <1550469571-25933-2-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <877edxt1f1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87tvh0syq2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87pnrosy29.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87pnrosy29.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kalle Valo Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Felix Fietkau , Matthias Brugger List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 09:20:46PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > So Masahiro, could you hold your x86 patch for a while until the mt76 > patch will be in Linus' tree? That should not take more than two weeks, > I think. No hurry - I won't take it into the x86 now and queue it for 5.1 because it is not something urgent or fixing a bug or so. It is a cleanup and as such it can surely wait for 5.2, I'd say. Unless there are other aspects which I'm not thinking of right now... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.