From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal-LDxbnhwyfcJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org,
linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Correct low level time calculation of r/w cycle
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:03:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429110341.208c096e@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190429063834.45967-2-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Xiaolei,
Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com> wrote on Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:38:30
+0800:
> At present, the flow of calculating AC timing of read/write cycle in SDR
> mode is that:
> At first, calculate high hold time which is valid for both read and write
> cycle using the max value between tREH_min and tWH_min.
> Secondly, calculate WE# pulse width using tWP_min.
> Thridly, calculate RE# pulse width using the bigger one between tREA_max
> and tRP_min.
>
> But NAND SPEC shows that Controller should also meet write/read cycle time.
> That is write cycle time should be more than tWC_min and read cycle should
> be more than tRC_min. Obviously, we do not achieve that now.
>
> This patch corrects the low level time calculation to meet minimum
> read/write cycle time required. After getting the high hold time, WE# low
> level time will be promised to meet tWP_min and tWC_min requirement,
> and RE# low level time will be promised to meet tREA_max, tRP_min and
> tRC_min requirement.
>
> Fixes: 93db446a424c ("mtd: nand: move raw NAND related code to the raw/ subdir")
This is definitely not the faulty patch. Please use --follow when
searching for the culprit, to avoid being blocked by the
renaming/moving work.
Also a Cc: stable might be worth.
> Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> index b6b4602f5132..dd855f860a4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static int mtk_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline,
> {
> struct mtk_nfc *nfc = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
> const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings;
> - u32 rate, tpoecs, tprecs, tc2r, tw2r, twh, twst, trlt;
> + u32 rate, tpoecs, tprecs, tc2r, tw2r, twh, twst = 0, trlt = 0;
>
> timings = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
> if (IS_ERR(timings))
> @@ -544,11 +544,19 @@ static int mtk_nfc_setup_data_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int csline,
> twh = DIV_ROUND_UP(twh * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> twh &= 0xf;
>
> - twst = timings->tWP_min / 1000;
> + /* Calculate min low level timing for write cycle */
> + if ((twh + 1) * 1000000 / rate < timings->tWC_min / 1000)
> + twst = (timings->tWC_min / 1000 - (twh + 1) * 1000000 / rate)
> + * 1000;
> + twst = max(timings->tWP_min, twst) / 1000;
> twst = DIV_ROUND_UP(twst * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> twst &= 0xf;
>
> - trlt = max(timings->tREA_max, timings->tRP_min) / 1000;
> + /* Calculate min low level timing for read cycle */
> + if ((twh + 1) * 1000000 / rate < timings->tRC_min / 1000)
> + trlt = (timings->tRC_min / 1000 - (twh + 1) * 1000000 / rate)
> + * 1000;
> + trlt = max3(trlt, timings->tREA_max, timings->tRP_min) / 1000;
> trlt = DIV_ROUND_UP(trlt * rate, 1000000) - 1;
> trlt &= 0xf;
>
With this fixed,
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-29 6:38 [PATCH 0/5] MTK NAND driver improvements and fixes Xiaolei Li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Correct low level time calculation of r/w cycle Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-2-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:03 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2019-04-29 9:35 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 10:02 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-30 0:59 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Improve data sampling timing for read cycle Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-3-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:49 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Add validity check for CE# pin setting Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-4-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:11 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Fix wrongly assigned oob buffer pointer issue Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-5-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:14 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:52 ` xiaolei li
2019-04-29 6:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Setup empty page threshold correctly Xiaolei Li
[not found] ` <20190429063834.45967-6-xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-29 9:22 ` Miquel Raynal
2019-04-29 9:57 ` xiaolei li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190429110341.208c096e@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal-ldxbnhwyfcjbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=richard-/L3Ra7n9ekc@public.gmane.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xiaolei.li-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).