Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: devapc: add devapc-mt6873 driver

Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-06-15T15:52:01Z

Hi, Neal:

Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年6月9日 週二 下午6:25寫道：
>
> MT6873 bus frabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violations are logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by devapc-mt6873 driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> ---

[snip]

> + {1, 0, 22, "MMSYS", true},
> + {1, 1, 23, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 2, 24, "SMI", true},
> + {1, 3, 25, "SMI", true},
> + {1, 4, 26, "SMI", true},
> + {1, 5, 27, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 6, 28, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> +
> + /* 30 */
> + {1, 7, 29, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 8, 30, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 9, 31, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 10, 32, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 11, 33, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 12, 34, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 13, 35, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 14, 36, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 15, 37, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 16, 38, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> +
> + /* 40 */
> + {1, 17, 39, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 18, 40, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 19, 41, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 20, 42, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 21, 43, "MMSYS_DISP", true},
> + {1, 22, 44, "MMSYS_DISP", true},

I think the device name, such as "MMSYS_DISP" does not help for debug.
When DevAPC print "MMSYS_DISP" has error, how does us know that to do
next? WHERE is the code may related to this error, and WHO should us
to find help? I think we just need vio address. Using mt8173 for
example, if the vio address is 0x1400d03c, we could find the device in
mt8173.dtsi [1],

ovl1: ovl@1400d000 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl";
reg = <0 0x1400d000 0 0x1000>;
};

we could know error occur in ovl1, and we could find the compatible
string "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl" in
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c, so we know WHERE is the code
may related to this error. And we could find maintainer list [2] to
find out the maintainer of this code:

DRM DRIVERS FOR MEDIATEK
M: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
M: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
L: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
S: Supported
F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/
F: drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/

and we know find WHO for help.
So I think we should drop device name and just print vio address is
enough for debug.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi?h=v5.8-rc1
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS?h=v5.8-rc1

> + {1, 23, 45, "MMSYS_MDP", true},
> + {1, 24, 46, "MMSYS_MDP", true},
> + {1, 25, 47, "MMSYS_MDP", true},
> + {1, 26, 48, "MMSYS_MDP", true},
> +

[snip]

> +
> +int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_devapc_soc *soc)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + u32 slave_type_num;
> + int slave_type;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(node))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + mtk_devapc_ctx->soc = soc;
> + slave_type_num = mtk_devapc_ctx->soc->slave_type_num;
> +
> + for (slave_type = 0; slave_type < slave_type_num; slave_type++) {
> + mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_pd_base[slave_type] =
> + of_iomap(node, slave_type);
> + if (!mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_pd_base[slave_type])
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mtk_devapc_ctx->infracfg_base = of_iomap(node, slave_type_num + 1);
> + if (!mtk_devapc_ctx->infracfg_base)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (!mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_irq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* CCF (Common Clock Framework) */
> + mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_infra_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev,
> + "devapc-infra-clock");
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_infra_clk))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + proc_create("devapc_dbg", 0664, NULL, &devapc_dbg_fops);

I think debugfs is not a basic function, so move debugfs function to
another patch.

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

> +
> + if (clk_prepare_enable(mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_infra_clk))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + start_devapc();
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, mtk_devapc_ctx->devapc_irq,
> + (irq_handler_t)devapc_violation_irq,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE, "devapc", NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err(PFX "request devapc irq failed, ret:%d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_devapc_probe);
> +