From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: "xiangsheng.hou" <xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com>
Cc: <broonie@kernel.org>, <benliang.zhao@mediatek.com>,
<dandan.he@mediatek.com>, <guochun.mao@mediatek.com>,
<bin.zhang@mediatek.com>, <sanny.chen@mediatek.com>,
<mao.zhong@mediatek.com>, <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
<donghunt@amazon.com>, <rdlee@amazon.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,v1 0/4] Add a driver for Mediatek SPI Nand controller
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 16:31:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211011163108.256752eb@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb200da61b942d93a272f3391f756c493cb5a342.camel@mediatek.com>
Hello,
xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com wrote on Mon, 11 Oct 2021 19:31:28 +0800:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 11:20 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:36:25 +0800:
> >
> > > Add a driver for Mediatek SPI Nand controller
> > >
> > > Mediatek SPI Nand controller cosists of two parts: on-host HW ECC
> > > and
> > > snfi(stand for spi nand flash interface). They can cowork with high
> > > performance which called ECC nfi mode. The nfi stand for nand flash
> > > interfacei(snfi a one part of nfi) which can support SPI Nand flash
> > > and raw nand flash.
> > >
> > > However, the snfi driver in spi subsytem need to be aware of nand
> > > parameter(page/spare size) and ecc status(enable/disable) when work
> > > at ECC nfi mode. The snfi driver in spi subsystem seems difficult
> > > to
> > > know these.
> > >
> > > Therefore, consider two ways to let snfi can get these information.
> > > The RFC patch send to review whether they are suitable and which
> > > solution maybe better.
> > >
> >
> > I've looked at both versions that you provided and I thought about a
> > number of things that cannot be done like this:
> > - I believe the snfi is a regular SPI controller. I will let Mark
> > confirm but I do not think we want to start writing SPI-NAND
> > controllers. Instead we write SPI controllers and we provide SPI-
> > mem
> > operations (we've explained this in a previous ELC, the video is
> > available on YouTube).
>
> The snfi controller can support multiple SPI protocols, which can
> support other SPI device in theory. However, the snfi need to know nand
> parameter and ecc status(enable/disable) when work with MTK on-host HW
> BCH ECC engine for nand flash.
>
> Therefore, the RFC patch v1/v2 is try the way to get these information.
>
> > - You cannot add an MTK ECC algorithm. This is dedicated for sofware
> > solutions only and as far as I understand your engine uses the BCH
> > algorithm.
> > - When the ECC engine is pipelined, there is an additional complexity
> > in interfacing it with a SPI controller (that's your case I
> > believe).
> > I have an example tintendhat is not yet upstream but I think worth
> > looking
> > at that I will send very soon (I will Cc: you on it).
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> MTK HW ECC(bch) algorithm can work in pipelined and external.
> However, the performance worse when work at ecternal which realize and
> verify in local. Therefore, try the pipelined in RFC patch v1/v2.
Yes this is completely expected as the data must be moved twice instead
of once. I believe pipelined mode is harder to implement in software but
brings better performances.
> And also realize the mtd/nand info can be get in spi driver which the
> spi-mxic driver in your patch. This may solve most of difficulty that
> encountered in the snfi driver that the RFC patch v1/v2 try to resolve.
Great, that was indeed the goal.
> I will prepare the RFC patch v3 with correct pipelined ecc engine
> realization for your review.
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-11 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-27 5:36 [RFC,v1 0/4] Add a driver for Mediatek SPI Nand controller Xiangsheng Hou
2021-09-27 5:36 ` [RFC,v1 1/4] mtd: ecc: move mediatek HW ECC driver Xiangsheng Hou
2021-09-27 5:36 ` [RFC,v1 2/4] mtd: ecc: realize Mediatek " Xiangsheng Hou
2021-09-27 5:36 ` [RFC,v1 3/4] spi: add Mediatek SPI Nand controller driver Xiangsheng Hou
2021-09-27 5:36 ` [RFC,v1 4/4] arm64: dts: add snfi node for spi nand Xiangsheng Hou
2021-10-08 9:20 ` [RFC,v1 0/4] Add a driver for Mediatek SPI Nand controller Miquel Raynal
2021-10-11 11:31 ` xiangsheng.hou
2021-10-11 14:31 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211011163108.256752eb@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=benliang.zhao@mediatek.com \
--cc=bin.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dandan.he@mediatek.com \
--cc=donghunt@amazon.com \
--cc=guochun.mao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mao.zhong@mediatek.com \
--cc=rdlee@amazon.com \
--cc=sanny.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=xiangsheng.hou@mediatek.com \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).