From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DCCC433FE for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:06:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=lQfrGf0TkswjXbAouqlpnUWIy9VgiBcukwnGHhn7JpU=; b=XPI04bvMOJ9bWq787pSD9GcT84 57hBX41S8xE4fUSe/QfOo+oq03RrXk9PvkgenHpOFqtDAaiPrfmBsaI4v7TzNOyCS2jIJF14qdNiA 0+9q4NNYfSjpcjt8ncsIw2aKO9HSDMr/wxll9xlrgxfWG11aagSu0Tv8n3JvemLXZxvlW4XfdKnYE DPsvKw70TDpFaOjC7mcMu02PVmm/kWYtKISaqo+HQRGbdLb4HC+n2GPQcaQimqCnAoAQp0EHOJ+zB 7/IDBQoytZPkbNroeobW5XOyijVDhFbtg3B47vFwAPcqF/x+b8bT2IjHXe20Vts8Ne6oZmeWTWArv M0kY8DCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osqOU-00GS3B-NE; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:05:50 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1osqOO-00GS0Q-4n for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 19:05:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4465B80E38; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F3B2C433D6; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 19:05:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1668020740; bh=lQfrGf0TkswjXbAouqlpnUWIy9VgiBcukwnGHhn7JpU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lpxBtp3zvmBYqfi22BFPCfAt2bUiFwC6prDsyQ2ROGmEQMBYatsPXtcWXjHWqBE4O Q7M1sJ7fbpRnovPPU2bK0g35j1XidJK8Ph6YtcLaNB2aH62xfainrAwQ4YuPvBByJe 8BuVkLGYO4KrTIzgJFSgOrsNAmH6qepDsOV1kLloBzTvHrgBufz8iOiKyFDiU3sY6D RciWY9+vWdlNkr1zXn48MQ4OTzbvUKeYXb9iv01B0ToM1x+4zsXlTpbLVHz0VDtfpl R0qyI10tqLIZyGTAe+JT0sIwEJ6nTWcJjy3ZWQOTnvQfGaHl55Y7U+5CmcgVmxJS1u f885YNiZnANFQ== Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:05:38 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , netdev@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name, john@phrozen.org, sean.wang@mediatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Bo.Jiao@mediatek.com, sujuan.chen@mediatek.com, ryder.Lee@mediatek.com, evelyn.tsai@mediatek.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, daniel@makrotopia.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, kvalo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC Message-ID: <20221109110538.431355ba@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221109_110544_363157_E71ABAFB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.62 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if > this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one > (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only > the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but > there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to > go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's > one. Any opinions? Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says. Let me bring it back to Under review in the meantime. While I have you - no acks for the bindings yet? On previous versions?