From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EDBC77B61 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=b2gy5ow7cG2NlnMJB2Q2VwlBrlh2rFjQI9/JeOXmqJI=; b=sx8HS0ieP5IRtPMmJ98GaZe0oS FxR7XM2vcgmmbRrbhbZ9ODCin5Gcx/E5hhbu94eNWrhEdtBU08bn2mtlMVu/ZWBAXUzTuKakTAQEJ S49treBXuJsnq9pvW2fHX9m8dg7Z7MuDdsVnBYAFXd9fS1VlhFhmeiikHb7C4EzZEI4jlEJ60GHed q6wPQfRT09NgJB7fqLDYs6I+mjkXjmRQAhuDbqnwwFIFb1ioahZscPH8QLJDmqDdxE5I3HlqAQmGp DJpeFdOVZ78OUslgyzmS15wzqBWDmu3ZzaT3gbV2/5+cgORBhFydrLWS0z7z2RFXYFss8wHlX/xdU EbLR+y0Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1prJaV-001Nh0-2i; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:24:11 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1prJaR-001Nfw-12; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:24:08 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F0A60A13; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DE62C433D2; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:24:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1682432646; bh=yliYoqpOgm0dIutKl8oAPe72ftrxSi7X6V4lwrOfkLA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cYe0gfy7XAzZ49rDBexhAmSFOO5duqhrkvX08mLuEdSLlIZuvrEUA0wnABu7Go3Ei pZOaYTqCP4I9mms9GBI+RAhoaNcVT25ExCJwHZF2pSOVsvSsm5BXiupNAfXCUWZaIG N706B/E1DNAwz8eaTZ5/3E8+GGvV6tdTaaabFLCaP4cxnyqlxubcJobnU/2X16Vb5O aE0OULprxkOs3j7ej1xl8ug2/CULqKkDjJvAIQoxw4gP25z2IyIbhpc9ATFUga+6YK qHbnt1NDX7BkackKR5Fy0X2BHtMBT7ypthSvAK75DxIDkaub6mmZGhJqItZGZzumR6 UbWnWqwnl3CtQ== Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 07:24:04 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Daniel Golle , Andrew Lunn Cc: Heiner Kallweit , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Qingfang Deng , SkyLake Huang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: phy: add driver for MediaTek SoC built-in GE PHYs Message-ID: <20230425072404.28b798e1@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20230424183755.3fac65b0@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230425_072407_420888_383041C4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.50 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:27:56 +0100 Daniel Golle wrote: > > Daniel, is it high prio for you to get it into 6.4 or 6.5 is okay? > > No rush, as this is mostly relevant for OpenWrt the thing which matters > most to me is having it in the next LTS kernel, so 6.5 should still be > fine I suppose. > > > > > I'm trying to get a read on whether we should merge it because it's > > kind of on the goal line for this merge window. > > > > If nobody feels strongly we can do this the traditional way - I'll > > just complain about RCT, hence kicking it back out into the field :) > > I understand Andrew's concerns and will resubmit for the next merge > window in 2 weeks, and without the LED part for now until PHY LED > infrastructure is more ready (ie. able to offload 'netdev' trigger > to hardware) Perfect, thanks!