Re: regression with 33140e668b10 thermal/drivers/mediatek: Control buffer enablement tweaks

[Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>]

Hi Frank and Daniel,

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 02:57:45PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Frank,
> 
> thanks for reporting and investigating the issue.
> 
> 
> On 31/08/2023 15:34, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > looked a bit deeper into it and it looks like i only need to add the fields in the mtk_thermal_data struct
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/auxadc_thermal.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/auxadc_thermal.c
> > @@ -690,6 +690,9 @@ static const struct mtk_thermal_data mt7986_thermal_data = {
> >          .adcpnp = mt7986_adcpnp,
> >          .sensor_mux_values = mt7986_mux_values,
> >          .version = MTK_THERMAL_V3,
> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg = APMIXED_SYS_TS_CON1,
> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_mask = GENMASK(31, 6) | BIT(3),
> > +       .apmixed_buffer_ctl_set = BIT(0),
> >   };
> > 
> > in my quick test the temprature can be read again and i'm near room temperature...i though it was a bit higher before, but as far as i understand the code, the values were fixed before and only made it configurable.
> > 
> > if someone can confirm that i'm right, i can send official patch.

Sorry for the delay, this was in my inbox but somehow not on my todo
list.

The patch looks correct. I think I simply missed adding the fields for
MTK_THERMAL_V3 chips. Sorry!

> 
> At the first glance, it seems the proposed change is correct and could be
> proposed as a hot fix.
> 
> However, the conditions with the version and the apmixed_buffer_ctl_reg
> looks a bit fuzzy.
> 
> Markus, can you revisit this part of code and consolidate the configurable
> approach ?

Yes, it indeed looks like I broke another condition there. I will give
it another close look and send a fix.

Best,
Markus