From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 921A5C4167B for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=drKp7vOQaf8U+QRh1FeY/LcVyu+UuwP3HJxpMXJxUIA=; b=EIipLNo3Aku2waeD3NEjKLAWIh AUStMc7rUsoqfWMgVaGGSAKhnaL0TnY1Y0zMTbVQILlTqTLfjyGgsucuoYesbttg79JSvs/EZmfef 5/dkRtiFpReORwQFrF0l5LIIMfHsQhB7y4NhEuJxJuNAepvFh1pqfZfFdIe4nPeG6rnlVIEi2Obxl KGZ6XtmOjIT8Uu8C4grZXoaxJyUBdB4fLI4wqK/DCuF3rFQ/gmuuyTnbXcWDVDUjzqz5R9QxyHDxC GY5HC1dlyhioEGg776JFkxSs/rMSoepERTzmUIeGCQ7Vymhn1IybMTVeNwmoHjtjPSJK0lTHsx9XR l2ADD29g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rAtni-00Acey-1O; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 15:27:02 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rAtnf-00Ace0-0C; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 15:27:00 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E780861D50; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C7BFC433C8; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 15:26:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1701876417; bh=ErOUL0OR4b4hUkNAU5v24U4RXrnfJw3pOrdPFiz7eOk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sQ9Iv/tGorGk7fvwR9E+4Z8h5RM1dV3/5S7kwpiBtNtvuNiTNNg36Df+XdZZavqwI mdvSKnon4grfYi5DaWWIyRZ8y61twyzALmuuMxZ9aQodeMBizWht8+vVH8SN1SbyfV 4l8QqzRBrdIw7snA1S/c6e6qr00V4vUxruBRTnV+gbNzeb/PAj3Ej2CfYm/aKwK45n 5vtBcYj5Q+ySjP2GkAVBz264JqHGfUbW4ZALgj+Sl85bten71VVVPeRtHFf8WdGjPY oq2mFIRf9xRm3WdijVp2xkwnJnCjZYcE8G2x7YLzgAFj7Xs7poDQfEfON0Zc9buXnQ 0nR7p0iSSPNJg== Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 20:56:46 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Maramaina Naresh Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Peter Wang , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , chu.stanley@gmail.com, Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quic_cang@quicinc.com, quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com, Nitin Rawat Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] ufs: core: Add CPU latency QoS support for ufs driver Message-ID: <20231206152646.GH12802@thinkpad> References: <20231204143101.64163-1-quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com> <20231204143101.64163-2-quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20231204143101.64163-2-quic_mnaresh@quicinc.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20231206_072659_190129_87B244FD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.65 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:00:59PM +0530, Maramaina Naresh wrote: > Register ufs driver to CPU latency PM QoS framework can improves > ufs device random io performance. > > PM QoS initialization will insert new QoS request into the CPU > latency QoS list with the maximum latency PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE > value. > > UFS driver will vote for performance mode on scale up and power > save mode for scale down. > > If clock scaling feature is not enabled then voting will be based > on clock on or off condition. > > tiotest benchmark tool io performance results on sm8550 platform: > > 1. Without PM QoS support > Type (Speed in) | Average of 18 iterations > Random Write(IPOS) | 41065.13 > Random Read(IPOS) | 37101.3 > > 2. With PM QoS support > Type (Speed in) | Average of 18 iterations > Random Write(IPOS) | 46784.9 > Random Read(IPOS) | 42943.4 > (Improvement % with PM QoS = ~15%). > > Co-developed-by: Nitin Rawat > Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat > Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Goud Arepalli > Signed-off-by: Maramaina Naresh > --- > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h | 8 +++++ > drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 16 +++++++++ > 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h > index f42d99ce5bf1..536805f6c4e1 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h > @@ -241,6 +241,14 @@ static inline void ufshcd_vops_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba, > hba->vops->config_scaling_param(hba, p, data); > } > > +static inline u32 ufshcd_vops_config_qos_vote(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + if (hba->vops && hba->vops->config_qos_vote) > + return hba->vops->config_qos_vote(hba); Please remove this callback as Bart noted. > + > + return UFSHCD_QOS_DEFAULT_VOTE; > +} > + > static inline void ufshcd_vops_reinit_notify(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > if (hba->vops && hba->vops->reinit_notify) > diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > index ae9936fc6ffb..13370febd2b5 100644 > --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c > @@ -1001,6 +1001,20 @@ static bool ufshcd_is_unipro_pa_params_tuning_req(struct ufs_hba *hba) > return ufshcd_get_local_unipro_ver(hba) < UFS_UNIPRO_VER_1_6; > } > > +/** > + * ufshcd_pm_qos_perf - vote for PM QoS performance or power save mode ufshcd_pm_qos_update() - Update PM QoS request > + * @hba: per adapter instance > + * @on: If True, vote for perf PM QoS mode otherwise power save mode > + */ > +static void ufshcd_pm_qos_perf(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on) > +{ > + if (!hba->pm_qos_init) > + return; > + > + cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&hba->pm_qos_req, on ? hba->qos_vote > + : PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > +} > + > /** > * ufshcd_set_clk_freq - set UFS controller clock frequencies > * @hba: per adapter instance > @@ -1153,6 +1167,10 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_clks(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned long freq, > trace_ufshcd_profile_clk_scaling(dev_name(hba->dev), > (scale_up ? "up" : "down"), > ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)), ret); > + > + if (!ret) > + ufshcd_pm_qos_perf(hba, scale_up); Can't you just move this before trace_ufshcd_profile_clk_scaling()? This also avoids checking for !ret. > + > return ret; > } > > @@ -9204,6 +9222,8 @@ static int ufshcd_setup_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool on) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + if (!ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba)) > + ufshcd_pm_qos_perf(hba, on); > out: > if (ret) { > list_for_each_entry(clki, head, list) { > @@ -9296,6 +9316,45 @@ static int ufshcd_init_clocks(struct ufs_hba *hba) > return ret; > } > > +/** > + * ufshcd_pm_qos_init - initialize PM QoS instance "Initialize PM QoS request" > + * @hba: per adapter instance > + */ > +static void ufshcd_pm_qos_init(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + if (!(hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_PM_QOS)) > + return; > + > + /* > + * called to configure PM QoS vote value for UFS host, > + * expecting qos vote return value from caller else > + * default vote value will be return. > + */ > + hba->qos_vote = ufshcd_vops_config_qos_vote(hba); No need of this variable too if you get rid of the callback. > + cpu_latency_qos_add_request(&hba->pm_qos_req, > + PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE); > + > + if (cpu_latency_qos_request_active(&hba->pm_qos_req)) > + hba->pm_qos_init = true; Why do you need this flag? > + > + dev_dbg(hba->dev, "%s: QoS %s, qos_vote: %u\n", __func__, > + hba->pm_qos_init ? "initialized" : "uninitialized", > + hba->qos_vote); > +} > + > +/** > + * ufshcd_pm_qos_exit - remove instance from PM QoS > + * @hba: per adapter instance > + */ > +static void ufshcd_pm_qos_exit(struct ufs_hba *hba) > +{ > + if (!hba->pm_qos_init) > + return; > + > + cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&hba->pm_qos_req); > + hba->pm_qos_init = false; > +} > + [...] > /** > * struct ufs_hba - per adapter private structure > * @mmio_base: UFSHCI base register address > @@ -912,6 +923,8 @@ enum ufshcd_mcq_opr { > * @mcq_base: Multi circular queue registers base address > * @uhq: array of supported hardware queues > * @dev_cmd_queue: Queue for issuing device management commands > + * @pm_qos_req: PM QoS request handle > + * @pm_qos_init: flag to check if pm qos init completed > */ > struct ufs_hba { > void __iomem *mmio_base; > @@ -1076,6 +1089,9 @@ struct ufs_hba { > struct ufs_hw_queue *uhq; > struct ufs_hw_queue *dev_cmd_queue; > struct ufshcd_mcq_opr_info_t mcq_opr[OPR_MAX]; > + struct pm_qos_request pm_qos_req; > + bool pm_qos_init; > + u32 qos_vote; Order doesn't match Kdoc. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்