From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12C8C8303C for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 05:48:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=3/j7NyuV/AK3q9Ia/DlforBWsL0uDc+k7QjS5jpN6BA=; b=ivdla0CAFQRle8WCAe3KyCAwy7 zvUDNcYpi2ZIxP3hg+rUBM/TBLMCdZnki6SgHpb7CZeraxDcbJYaet36TXVOUp4MuXHj9G6FI+yeW zbSptAiE4VtvbbyyXYnFrur7WuwiZEANB/9f6RjTeAN4oJL2tDXgduwJFLKUPQ+Jv5CJdyoHASfPk 4qd6x9FdzgdH8xI2SqMOI9hLgJQS+SPdgNRswqbhP3WvtXpcQdSjYs/p39ly/xjPr2Aic8yyVS0wR aFukUph1V1WMr9UR/dsJzmdKN6g4Siql8yvBqfwlsg704AV+HuJhTK5ssMgTrzopgz55b0WKX0y58 gA+9xlww==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYei4-00000001TZG-3SDj; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:48:12 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uYeen-00000001TCw-39C1; Mon, 07 Jul 2025 05:44:49 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFB36112D; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 05:44:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDC0AC4CEF4; Mon, 7 Jul 2025 05:44:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1751867088; bh=eu+GHjOCvCqVRqoV63kexKMOhEID9n+g92CJ/14sRIg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qVvdJli/K1bLN5V7IZXJn+i7qVsLuHc04/BVVu7V5YFQuxNYCzJnanl9TJV2s4u4O ZrYzzUNlEbYPm0iGu0leOc9FRhDw1RzZ2Y6QTKnld3ga1v9KY2GDAaTyTYJSTkHeMJ 9/5sMnr7/NfIVCuOUImcIEz2yItPERe5vrvxp6l+UPoNO6hbUu3po9+7pQSM5/H8jn 4jqrYKWakPv7gzCU0XmEon3BoGMGnE8P7Ek6epBomcO3UUGVX8Nw0TSz3Yowxp32xi Wz9AIqm0PqpNKmKRUHwkmq7CDwGSve7eYuOwikbIAg+ux1ePKm0yvT7jTY6YnLAHyA y1GFlrPylvORg== Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 07:44:45 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: shangyao lin Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] dt-bindings: media: mediatek: add seninf-core binding Message-ID: <20250707-merciful-electric-jerboa-bb5bae@krzk-bin> References: <20250707013154.4055874-1-shangyao.lin@mediatek.com> <20250707013154.4055874-3-shangyao.lin@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250707013154.4055874-3-shangyao.lin@mediatek.com> X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 09:31:43AM +0800, shangyao lin wrote: > From: "shangyao.lin" > > 1. Add camera isp7x module device document > Still no SoB, still not tested, still no checkpatch... and also: ... > + > +... > \ No newline at end of file Look, you have patch warnings. Review your patches before you post them. You should reach internally to mediatek colleagues to explain you how this process works. I really do not understand why mediatek has so poor quality of work and cannot improve over last 1-2 years! > -- > 2.18.0 >