From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Add mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw binding
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 22:49:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715034904.GA4699-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd561a8c-f1a7-41c2-a686-abc89f5fa555@collabora.com>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:41:30PM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 14/07/25 16:08, Nicolas Frattaroli ha scritto:
> > The MediaTek MT8196 SoC has new cpufreq hardware, with added memory
> > register ranges to control Dynamic-Voltage-Frequency-Scaling.
> >
> > The DVFS hardware is controlled through a set of registers referred to
> > as "FDVFS"; one is a location from which a magic number is read to
> > ensure DVFS should be used, the other is a region to set the desired
> > target frequency that DVFS should aim towards for each performance
> > domain.
> >
> > Instead of working around the old binding and its already established
> > meanings for the reg items, add a new binding. The FDVFS register memory
> > regions are at the beginning, which allows us to easily expand this
> > binding for future SoCs which may have more than 3 performance domains.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > .../cpufreq/mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw.yaml | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..26bf21e05888646b4d1bdac95bfba0f36e037ffd
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: MediaTek CPUFreq for MT8196 and related SoCs
>
> title: MediaTek Hybrid CPUFreq for MT8196/MT6991 series SoCs
>
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + MT8196 uses CPUFreq management hardware that supports dynamic voltage
> > + frequency scaling (dvfs), and can support several performance domains.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + items:
> > + - description: FDVFS magic number register region
>
> As already said in the other commit, we might just be able to avoid adding the
> magic number register region :-)
>
> > + - description: FDVFS control register region
> > + - description: OPP tables and control for performance domain 0
> > + - description: OPP tables and control for performance domain 1
> > + - description: OPP tables and control for performance domain 2
> > +
> > + "#performance-domain-cells":
> > + description:
> > + Number of cells in a performance domain specifier. Must be 1.
>
> The description is redundant and doesn't add any real information, I think you
> should drop it.
>
> Bindings maintainers, please, opinions?
Drop.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 14:08 [PATCH v2 0/4] MT8196 CPUFreq Support Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-07-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq: Add mediatek,mt8196-cpufreq-hw binding Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-07-14 14:41 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-15 3:49 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2025-07-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Refactor match data into struct Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-07-14 14:36 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Separate per-domain and per-instance data Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-07-14 14:42 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2025-07-14 14:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Add support for MT8196 Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-07-14 14:34 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715034904.GA4699-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).