From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F07FCCF9E3 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:32:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=N66lmHQ41ZDXetSBgvIvh3usb9oXxS7iym9uIs0RMFM=; b=3L0INPnJS8LnWGt1EdocVfZQd2 KNGGR74u2nAVmWrIM0yfbv//7ZVOwbtG3Qrikq5JQtZnFd+bO7OZuCtzxF2704JhcYr0IocLD0lGv IVIusYLjQ142vRN1upi6K+zc7Q/wvAMP0xiLw4WKWLJdJ/FqnHMa1BkOF1aY+VurbOnmLk+AuFg3U uymdn22F6F/HcZv6hdESFHUoBtVWk5hmnbJuI+ooDGoiU0Yh+EzIrjPOzBagZiOhi0pQJcwrg7j17 TYmdOo2s4dmSSSSQ2I/UEtzMKotQfmo0tJM0KjCoMwDP8QTwk8vyo/2AN8SZvs9xazGRNgfNt+ofT aUZ2enmA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vGTJc-0000000CuSY-1nIB; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 02:32:04 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vGTJZ-0000000CuRs-36A8; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 02:32:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AD743403; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7009C4CEF7; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 02:32:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762309921; bh=N66lmHQ41ZDXetSBgvIvh3usb9oXxS7iym9uIs0RMFM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f52iJApXniSnJG23KU5Oz+PgjvuiRtr+krHr/tt3GTouhQj548TRkgfRflFebtszu LhNWS9yekrzDAqRuxdjntOyeR560iDOI/X5MAMpjNO38HOiB+dXiDlWelGWfWIHRkd 5ObftU5iDrmvL1Z/i6zUGpEJbigiNjVMUZaxTvQlXHmZ/rXIg/MC+oJpqN34AVgG+A p8pOtPmfsGzFHOhSrB4pAADf5Qmc2ZSBvph1JnaWxj+eDQEP+EpJRG04ZezurbfCpA k8oiKnnpqT6/19f/KpfKt35hnV1J/JQwk3UNisk/lkaVXxCdTdUhYA/XPagWtYOkLG rj7T4yKvb//QQ== Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 18:32:00 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: airoha: Reorganize airoha_queue struct Message-ID: <20251104183200.41b4b853@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-2-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> References: <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-0-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> <20251103-airoha-tx-linked-list-v1-2-baa07982cc30@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251104_183201_798774_D9660FFE X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.39 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 03 Nov 2025 11:27:56 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Do not allocate memory for rx-only fields for hw tx queues and for tx-only > fields for hw rx queues. Could you share more details (pahole) Given that napi_struct is in the same struct, 20B is probably not going to make much difference?