From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D661ECF9C47 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=slrKq2kMshZDspv3pvDI2DIfj40KNFueWZ7HeyLXlPc=; b=Qqq6aH/Y92AH4+0ZFsYmfSIt4j Zvs6KuZLT74adAOAeNghLlczOkKWfisfIIxQWo/8FKSD3R0289agMxx6/apCxMn5r6WTXspmaN8Mt ZcpKH7mQ+oYsFHm97ok4ISoozpIPeb+q2a4CZVbYI9CgwYxh+cUtt3W95kxtvLAPIas8lcte5KP+m wLGXWFRSEq5rVuALo5kjOG+lbhZAtguSNw8FIxdcK/JgXVitoVnZkQujAdg576V/6HYwpvhB/tRbR n0ODZ1Idl5TnYTcNR3aTuSISzrwW++AVWajRI637zzL9/MjSsnY45m7DrBZhJW7MgTtyzhLGmYwtH lE8vEC2g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vM7gj-000000071xf-2CcK; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:17 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vM7gg-000000071wF-3UL5; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:16 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199B540313; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08A7C116C6; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763656754; bh=BnOq3z51JqZJ8uQTHJFdAkzYEzpauy5TFsDbeB3BY4s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V2kg0Tjj5QAKnndNOFZg5UC+/n0jys+8p9t5bz8p2y04vHxqxgOE2geeBodAahomQ 6m3d1+OMgwqwVvJImgdEJxg6I3jVlPT88OhSxZ93cPZtdsMP+msfK+1w3cGjTUH5Nv KVXDDGdIK+t3KqYt6Q2bt2kY6nQrRG1SAVr2XiYmixARbV/XEroZo9xi4/Ag7AT0SJ bSMR3ZrrUBkYF+RvU0I7zZpD2Aa96Em+gKXCZFEiXjNqiLkrPQxYJAxKRG/bx0AGZn SfYsbZi5aoUPmDMmRb3KWQe8ti0Kl2mPqG4nN/orjZlqLPNlTDR71a2uEHdq723P1/ DQlMOgkh/0V3Q== Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 16:39:04 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Konstantin Ryabitsev , patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org, Sjoerd Simons , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com, jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org, chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com, vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, lorenzo@kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name, kernel@collabora.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@makrotopia.org, bryan@bryanhinton.com, conor.dooley@microchip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add Openwrt One AP functionality Message-ID: <20251120163904.GL661940@google.com> References: <20251115-openwrt-one-network-v4-0-48cbda2969ac@collabora.com> <176360700676.1051457.11874224265724256534.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> <20251120152829.GH661940@google.com> <20251120073639.3fd7cc7c@kernel.org> <20251120154012.GJ661940@google.com> <20251120074457.5aa06d89@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20251120_083914_909640_C90918D9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 20 Nov 2025, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 20/11/25 16:44, Jakub Kicinski ha scritto: > > On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 15:40:12 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > - [v4,02/11] dt-bindings: PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MT7981 PCIe compatible > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,03/11] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,tphy: Add support for MT7981 > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,04/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b: Add PCIe and USB support > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,05/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b-openwrt-one: Enable PCIe and USB > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,06/11] dt-bindings: net: mediatek,net: Correct bindings for MT7981 > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bc41fbbf6faa > > > > > > - [v4,07/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b: Add Ethernet and WiFi offload support > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,08/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b-openwrt-one: Enable Ethernet > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,09/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b: Disable wifi by default > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,10/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b: Add wifi memory region > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > - [v4,11/11] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt7981b-openwrt-one: Enable wifi > > > > > > (no matching commit) > > > > > > This is a very odd way of presenting that one patch from the set was merged. > > > > > > Not sure I've seen this before. Is it new? > > > > > > It's very confusing. Is it a core PW thing and / or can it be configured? > > > > It's k.org infra bot. Konstantin, would it be possible to highlight > > more that a series is partially applied? > > I guess that adding "(subset)" like b4 does would improve those messages quite > a lot ;-) Right. Or better still, just omit the ones that weren't touched. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]