From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0BE606D802 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=nmCAbQwD; dkim=temperror header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=Rk5o+f1O DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Owner; bh=rYHcTddsMGFJxoooXt9bGT/cprdRwsLwfNyq5sklZCs=; b=nmCAbQwD2VCE9TToXG4fUv9Gys Bzh5Bk5Sr0+DwbCoXKGop0TI57CpV1YCpwWac3SDSH1lF29jsCoG7mToCDHF7FOpO24FjFEzZX3jE j+yb9UQoPgi0ZYXHv1rGdrl8sDRkXXdF+8tm8O3wNJOhyA19o83AC+hnluN6I21OzQVQ0UrjAXnWu rHPiCLFpXzREkatROar+9G7PRPGIMQZnBieyzcT1saIijDX/rwTfrXSBN4W1e4lopcQHElq8lsax2 d0Y9azjNireqLQ9GziYB1CoTCp2CrCYktFV4pkh/RTeNSz+SFKUoMf7C7GZZZirh9qk9UrHuOu/VN zxyvfHwA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOyRQ-00000009GV6-3Ded; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 14:27:48 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOyRO-00000009GUl-2IX5; Thu, 05 Nov 2026 14:27:46 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6D8600AA; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 305201F000C1; Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:27:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793888865; bh=rYHcTddsMGFJxoooXt9bGT/cprdRwsLwfNyq5sklZCs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Rk5o+f1O6peQxQ9MqrF1F0MAgBXS1+MgHM1NL5rXIJ26rX2a7K/cTEaoepPELDyrj eqj6eQtTFCOr6fANT/YDv7PBY8qUn+sqP87GUD6Xa73W4qRHUy4vbGr0Ltycf8T8jg vEsW3D83z0t7XuVMbr/tGJ1QgCBxjDRSaCzNFZzs9CYyvmZBAk8BarpROmU+k1U1bs 4xxI3zTbSNdX1BNJMAq2u0FF8p8pDQDkDo0kHZnAcoZBUs8F0u4eirZmnzteFm0Rr2 lchBU6uFjD3odeJIkkNYZt3sUGSuaX479mgI4BRJt+YqJ1++38R9a9SHY4wIp8B2OP XiMELJIEKt/zw== Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:27:42 +0000 From: Simon Horman To: Sandeep Haemoon Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau , Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip page_pool for Message-ID: <20261105142742.GU865646@horms.kernel.org> References: X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 12:48:46AM +0200, Sandeep Haemoon wrote: > page_pool allocates order-0 pages and the pool is created with > MTK_PP_MAX_BUF_SIZE. Rings that need larger buffers (9K jumbo or the > HW-LRO rings) cannot use it. Only create/use a page_pool when > ring->frag_size fits in a page; the large-buffer path already uses > mtk_max_buf_alloc(). > > This is required by the 9K support in the previous patch; the > large-buffer path it relies on comes from the MediaTek downstream > series. > > Link: https://github.com/mediatek/mtk-openwrt-feeds > Signed-off-by: Sandeep Haemoon It may not be particularly important, but I do wonder if the order of the patches in this patch-set should be reversed: as it is 9k support seems to be added by 1/2 and fixed in 2/2. That notwithstanding: Reviewed-by: Simon Horman