[PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[Yang Li]

There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
appropriate error message in case of a failure.

./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
index 786b1469eb52..b499eade957e 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
@@ -861,7 +861,6 @@ static void ufs_mtk_init_mcq_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 		irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
 		if (irq < 0) {
 			host->mcq_intr_info[i].irq = MTK_MCQ_INVALID_IRQ;
-			dev_err(hba->dev, "get platform mcq irq fail: %d\n", i);
 			goto failed;
 		}
 		host->mcq_intr_info[i].hba = hba;
-- 
2.20.1.7.g153144c

Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 12/07/23 08:48, Yang Li ha scritto:
> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.
> 
> ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[Sudeep Holla]

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.
> 
> ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[Sudeep Holla]

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> > appropriate error message in case of a failure.
> > 
> > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> > 
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
> 
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> 

Sorry for this, I didn't mean to ack this patch, no idea how on earth I
managed to do that (must be some wrong key combination in my email client)
but I wanted and meant to ack only this [1]. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712062853.11007-9-frank.li@vivo.com

Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()

[Martin K. Petersen]

Yang,

> There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> appropriate error message in case of a failure.

Applied to 6.6/scsi-staging, thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering