From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1CDC77B6E for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:20:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WNFLBm9P5zjQNegZlohtpQtHq2lLlOO2MMnDqkjQZGA=; b=ppL4e9YgHdE/JA4iyfvyHB3Xaz NaXY9Vvu3TEPWm1BsMzfuXoKOLvNeaoQrxFh3/HCblHh38iOt/yWcEgYgTic4jEhyWTzVWxEgBtlv +kDRU2k7+i8WPWSkL7Qtd1RUevCBgxhijH/AW8AwFC6iTUmRp9hrphtiUyi9UZ2wF8heYwo5y8n4t ZYOot5uPigrr4tJi4u3xXjlFiuHIoZDIDQtNP17minOhpVxY9Ce2guSQ5iTj8BnQXU9FG9P2lbJLn PlycET1LP3LlUgGifH10lJ6PKtsZVT32p6hS5YGUEX42U1Jeug9DSEw+10L2XC/sXfHVnxfVKiv3E sqZLWjnw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmwrw-006FUS-10; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:20:08 +0000 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk ([2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pmwrq-006FQl-0L; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:20:05 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBD726603218; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:19:59 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1681392000; bh=zyLNmnfNyceNKY5LBE9mhScILY9Dbz+FbeLmTMBp8cI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=cIUmClu7FHs9xjiZexEXmR0VU1d1P+tGwjVpRX4TWVwOZElm4SUn04vjhvZtr3nB2 RKOAO9gIeSpqAciIquSuCiAZvOIOQ5i6jBFabD15GZzyxsNO/ln1NrWMYBj5ibtT8i A5zp7xgt/QP21zGOovUYf24THw2egu5cLb6sEE8+p08GGgG/ilL0PaY6in2022QgPr BgENQvB70mbOOkS4n8eaW+DpvpqAxkNcZnkYOJYgVvWnhKJng0Uh49Yrn194vnEBgc UFfkNGDGELPO2TI5fNikL3WgDAGJIzpcbhIRHt6UAtXYtOHITGyFHVvy0cqXhEj4mh PzRyRSAaBpHdA== Message-ID: <23dea66b-27cd-dbeb-37f5-ad9566e50962@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:19:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188: add bus protection Content-Language: en-US To: Trevor Wu , broonie@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org References: <20230413104713.7174-1-trevor.wu@mediatek.com> <20230413104713.7174-7-trevor.wu@mediatek.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230413104713.7174-7-trevor.wu@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230413_062002_321812_56E47715 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.65 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 13/04/23 12:47, Trevor Wu ha scritto: > Add bus protection for reset controller. > > Signed-off-by: Trevor Wu Is MT8188 the only SoC that will ever use bus protection for reset, now and in the future? ...otherwise, I think that the best solution here would be to implement that into the reset controller itself. Regards, Angelo