public inbox for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <lee@kernel.org>,
	<ZhanZhan.ge@mediatek.com>
Cc: <robh@kernel.org>, <krzk+dt@kernel.org>, <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<sean.wang@mediatek.com>, <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	<sen.chu@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@collabora.com>, <yong.mao@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] rtc: mt6359: Add RTC hardware range and add support for start-year
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 15:05:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <247abc15-d82f-3e8f-5202-edc6099707df@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0748868d-4789-fcaa-e70f-6a4508411b36@mediatek.com>


On 9/24/24 12:08, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> 
> On 9/23/24 18:00, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Add the RTC hardware range parameters to enable the possibility
>> of using the `start-year` devicetree property which, if present,
>> will set the start_secs parameter by overriding the defaults
>> that this driver is setting;
>>
>> To keep compatibility with (hence have the same date/time reading
>> as) the old behavior, set:
>>   - range_min to 1900-01-01 00:00:00
>>   - range_max to 2027-12-31 23:59:59 (HW year max range is 0-127)
>>   - start_secs defaulting to 1968-01-02 00:00:00
>>
>> Please note that the oddness of starting from January 2nd is not
>> a hardware quirk and it's done only to get the same date/time
>> reading as an RTC which time was set before this commit.
>>
>> Also remove the RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET addition and subtraction in
>> callbacks set_time() and read_time() respectively, as now this
>> is already done by the API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 13 ++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> [snip]
> 
> Thanks for helping add new patch fix for RTC.
> 
>> @@ -302,6 +293,10 @@ static int mtk_rtc_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>>       device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
>>       rtc->rtc_dev->ops = &mtk_rtc_ops;
>> +    rtc->rtc_dev->range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_1900;
>> +    rtc->rtc_dev->range_max = mktime64(2027, 12, 31, 23, 59, 59);
>> +    rtc->rtc_dev->start_secs = mktime64(1968, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0);
>> +    rtc->rtc_dev->set_start_time = true;
>>       return devm_rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc_dev);
>>   }
> 
> Dear @Zhanhan, Please help to leave comment if you think there is 
> something need to be clarify. For example, I've found some relate origin 
> defines
> in "include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h"
> #define RTC_MIN_YEAR    1968
> #define RTC_BASE_YEAR    1900
> #define RTC_NUM_YEAR    128
> #define RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET    (RTC_MIN_YEAR - RTC_BASE_YEAR)
> 
> Should MediaTek remove RTC_MIN_YEAR and RTC_BASE_YEAR in next patch?
> And since there may not exist any smartphone/tablet/TV using mt6397
> RTC earlier than 2010? Is it possible to change
> RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_1900 to RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_2000 without breaking
> compatibility for these devices?
> 
> Thanks
> Macpaul Lin
> 

After discussing these change with ZhanZhan, MediaTek think use 
RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_1900 and the other changes are okay.

Reviewed-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: ZhanZhan Ge <zhanzhan.ge@mediatek.com>

Thanks!
Macpaul Lin


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-24  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-23 10:00 [PATCH v1 0/3] rtc: mt6359: Cleanup and support start-year property AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-23 10:00 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: mediatek: mt6397: Add start-year property to RTC AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-23 21:21   ` Conor Dooley
2024-10-09 10:15   ` Lee Jones
2024-10-09 10:17     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-09 10:33       ` Lee Jones
2024-10-09 10:37         ` Lee Jones
2024-10-09 10:48           ` Macpaul Lin
2024-10-09 11:05           ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-10-16  8:04   ` (subset) " Lee Jones
2024-09-23 10:00 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] rtc: mt6359: Add RTC hardware range and add support for start-year AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-24  4:08   ` Macpaul Lin
2024-09-24  7:05     ` Macpaul Lin [this message]
2024-09-24  9:30       ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-24  9:28     ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-09-23 10:00 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] rtc: mt6359: Use RTC_TC_DOW hardware register for wday AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2024-11-11 21:04 ` (subset) [PATCH v1 0/3] rtc: mt6359: Cleanup and support start-year property Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=247abc15-d82f-3e8f-5202-edc6099707df@mediatek.com \
    --to=macpaul.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ZhanZhan.ge@mediatek.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sen.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yong.mao@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox