Re: [PATCH V7 1/2] regulator: Add document for MT6323 regulator

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>]

On Friday 26 February 2016 15:58:30 John Crispin wrote:
> On 26/02/2016 15:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 22 February 2016 13:56:56 John Crispin wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic-p3rKhJxN3npAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
> >> Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> >> ---
> >> This patch needs to be merged post-rc1 as it depends on the MFD series of
> >> the PMIC which is already inside Lee's tree pending the PR.
> > 
> > (dropping most lists)
> > 
> > Hi John,
> > 
> > Do you or someone else have a git tree that has all the remaining
> > patches for mt6323 that need to be merged?
> > 
> > We are doing a code review session at Linaro Connect and it seems
> > like a nice platform to include, given that it is simpler than
> > most of the phone oriented platforms that have lots of complex
> > code out of tree.
> > 
> >       Arnd
> > 
> 
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> sure thing i can get one online for you in the next 48 hours, including
> all the patches required to boot mt7623 with v4.4. I still have a few
> outdated patches in my local tree for the scpsys and usb part, so I need
> to extract latest versions from the ML.
> 
> would v4.4 be ok or do you prefer me using the latest rc ?

4.4 is fine, whichever is easier for you, thanks!

I was actually thinking of the patches that presumably are in some
BSP from Mediatek that you used as the base and that contain code that
has not been posted on mailing lists.

Having both your version and the original source available would
of course be even better.

Assuming that the mediatek tree exists and is accessible, do you
have an estimate of how much of it you haven't yet rewritten for
submission, or how much is not in a state that is upstreamable
at all (e.g. the GPU driver for MT7623N)?

	Arnd