From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 095E9C04FFE for ; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:59:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From :Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=t+KRfjf68PXTMIN2077uFRRp+7xFwbNQ1cUQc8k3tRU=; b=ROd0qCNqg1UlgVpbqXVQ8rnY5f f24bUHSd+MaTtJ2DbojqOcXqHqspaXGq5hbHPTR2w4KWPsZc4APw92EI/NiaSKj2pHIvJNyYl/y06 CzQBsbvpKPZ5l6aC1vrooIjEAxuOqW0BVQZna9k6nTq02wQE9xEMDZzm4NcBKvF3oZ/XQQpmPoYoq cJ5ZQUhEe/wHlo8E6wEHMTMJjjCWxdMs3wfSG2/cZkgP/COvE4YmIalHvgQ9uwzzQLHjECTo1AC7z bHHH3JXWWyG7PFj5wcdx0tEm/UtXvNjTetzefv93o9We4KcqtamsUgr9cSbQQTjVGvDUPu7ZNg+SC +OVFQ58g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8znT-0000000E4A7-2woI; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:59:11 +0000 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com ([46.235.227.194]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s8znP-0000000E48A-3k6f; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:59:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1716199146; bh=YXr5OkApT26+XTrMA/rnWYnu5JA55GQIUti3yFLD6rE=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=vThg0w5GsICMH+h606V0YqDGp5cHx2istjfTQxTxSjOMhxyn8xYYhWoPKPswYI8qG xTNGLq8cVs7WWpvnlXR5/sT+v7C65wnK2ZHNZ5HlZiG54vUVvo8vcCh1+e2UIxPPqa e6RjOHpchfDDm9PLk9ICdPbrG0JsdB8lPa/6C15wQWYm/0K9jGzy+/p38i6/QVhy5Q AFo0SG8OApHsJ1SgpG6hE9fZL2X5uHEHIyqeXTA2/Ug0oDB5aHD3jPSjEa3QvGVUw5 vku4tNZd+J0hYSwmrIYvOEOgqeFvXcu4ZRMGAsB7PrHtCRDQkiaEMdxijIj+jYKXC6 YD2B+9DSdhs2g== Received: from [100.113.186.2] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05C1237820CD; Mon, 20 May 2024 09:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <38422eed-cc98-488e-a3d7-a01b6f3ba1fb@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:59:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: mediatek,mt8195-scpsys: add mediatek,mt8365-scpsys To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , MandyJH Liu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20240518211159.142920-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20240518211159.142920-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240520_025908_103142_7BEA124D X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.50 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > Add a new mediatek,mt8365-scpsys compatible, for the SCPSYS syscon block > having power controller. Previously the DTS was re-using SYSCFG > compatible, but that does not seem right, because SYSCFG does not have > children. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno